FTC testimony highlights file-sharing dangers

TalkBack 12 of 13:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

Why It Seems

consumers are always one step behind the technology advancements based on a premise of criminal,or 'crime premises.

If it was the FTC was doing its job,rather than attending 'were the boys are,it would be looking into the grand fraud forced on consumers via 'contracting,and liscencing of copyrighted media. Where 'nothing is guarenteed,(except for invasion of privacy,and recording of your purchase by the proprietor),no type of performance,or good is actually considered sold (the real debate of copyrighted works where consumers are constituant of there assets), no receipt or proof of sale is given to the purcaser(s).

All of these can be considered basic to commerce. But the constency is that instead of utilizing the promise of greater 'effects in terms of copyrighted goods through the technology,constituents are 'contending to confiscate technology - through contract, detailing that 'all copyrighted affects fall under the description delegated through them. And controlling 'assets namely known through 'patranage using that same technology to contain 'usury through liscence,denoting the persistence that laws such as DMCA,and others provide its 'lawful definition to do so.

That is not correct. DMCA copyrighted 'goods,when they are utilized as 'owned (yes owned .. go on ) can utilize encryption true, but DMCA does not qualify utilizing 'liscence,and its parallel security to usurp through contract the privacy,and asset patrons should expect to products they purchase. As well DMCA does not give 'lifetime right of person to the right of the asset as known through consumer of them. (yes.. go on).

The utilization of technology to extol a product,should not mean a constitutional right (yes .. go on ), can be taken as a business contract because the technology allows programming to a secured product such as a copyrighted one. Using the digital inspection of programming to define 'right - in person above the 'choice'' of person. (and you know they dont offer the product is why ).

Detailing that copyrighted effects are priviledged to utilize 'privacy rights,'contract over 'patranage and receipt through the technology wich is meant to do so,shows just what headwise can be expected of congress people who cannot tell because of the incorrect premise told through 'piracy of law.

True there is no such detail wich does not share that the technologies can be utilized by 'any contributive copyright model,it is the detail of wich 'all copyright models are given to something the present constituents deem making and creating the utility creating vast 'black wholes of 'tennant aggreement,over advanced usage models in technology and persons, wich can create commerce,asset,and consumer features in new products.

Right- no copyright law details this.No does DMCA,Nor the Electronic Theft Act.

If you have copyrighted effects they can be 'warranted,and utilize the distribution inherent within the technologies beyond the 'person of those using the 'licence model.In a way the asset remains the 'in and of law -copyright of author,and still asset of consumer.

And true,they do not want to argue that.The idea is simply to vacate the reason without description of the details involved.

Idea being it is much easier to create 'contract via computing power,than it is to rationalize 'fair-commerce via patronage,receipt,and performance of good,and creation of asset,while they remain on the books as something they should not be accounting to.

Namely proof of purchase and idea that the technology 'includes 'distribution 'power.(and true DMCA does not detail distribution in persons of author only).

Unfortunately since the FTC is here doing the p2p thing. It cannot be doing its job in other areas. Being the only premise for its business is crime and criminals.

There are other ways of keeping in the stereo of these ideas.

.just talking.

Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 05/07/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Addressing Compliance Requirements for Privacy, Data Retention, and e-Discovery Trend Micro Protecting individual and financial data, retaining data, and meeting ... Download Now
• Reducing Server Total Cost of Ownership with VMware Virtualization Software VMware VMware virtualization enables customers to reduce their server TCO and ... Download Now
• The True Costs of Virtual Server Solutions VMware In an economic environment that is repeatedly heralding the message "do ... Download Now