On MovieTome: Why you didn't see Shatner in TREK
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 46:
Next »
« Previous
absolutely ...
If you can read information from the masters then they are the product (and you can). I find this is hilarious - anyone with half a brain could see that this sort of thing will happen quite often with 'software patents'. The problem is not whether or not US companies should be liable for infringing products overseas (they should be - or else you screw another US company which is selling to the same market, and I think this is the point AT&T is making) - the problem is with software patents. We were doing just fine without software patents - copyright law was more than adequate - but someone just had to make them up. By the way, how many Microsoft products do you see distributed with something like "unauthorized duplication of this product is a violation of patent law"?
Posted by: zoroaster   Posted on: 02/21/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Well...  Patrick Jones | 02/21/07
Well, either way the outcome  Boot_Agnostic | 02/21/07
absolutely ...  zoroaster | 02/21/07
The results should be interesting, to say the least.  Letophoro | 02/21/07
Or  Henry Miller | 02/21/07
Confused...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/21/07
That's not the case.  Letophoro | 02/21/07
According to the article...  A.Sinic | 02/21/07
I'm not arguing with any of your points.  Letophoro | 02/21/07
I see...i see  xuniL_z | 02/21/07
not so...  zoroaster | 02/21/07
And once again....  SpikeyMike | 02/21/07
In good company  BruceWheelock@... | 02/21/07
Umm...  rapson | 02/21/07
MS shouldn?t talk  Par-Pro | 02/21/07
no culture  BregS | 02/23/07
crooked American patent laws  dirtfarmer | 02/21/07
You are so right  Too Old For IT | 02/21/07
And while we're at it...  macbill | 02/21/07
What a wonderful idea!  Linux User 147560 | 02/21/07
oil slick  shraven | 02/21/07
You're right...  Linux User 147560 | 02/21/07
Correct oh my yes  Boot_Agnostic | 02/22/07
Once again  xuniL_z | 02/21/07
Hold on there cowboy.....  seosamh_z | 02/21/07
say again?  shraven | 02/21/07
I agree, The Brits are thieves  John Zern | 02/21/07
Nice try dirtyfarmer  John Zern | 02/21/07
Not what he said.  shraven | 02/21/07
What a closed mind  Par-Pro | 02/21/07
France?  cmjrees | 02/22/07
Patent law in re: software...  Raymond Danner | 02/21/07
THE SUPREME COURT WILL HAVE A PATENT SEARCH HAY DAY  BALTHOR | 02/21/07
What *is* the product?  handydan918 | 02/21/07
Man! A can of worms...  I am Gorby | 02/21/07
InCREDibly Good Point!  TechinMN | 02/23/07
Patens and DRM  wizardb@... | 02/21/07
huh?  zoroaster | 02/21/07
AT&T's patent..  whoop_123 | 02/21/07
Thanks for the blueprint!  spinella@... | 02/21/07
Software ownership  Stovies | 02/21/07
MS shouldn?t talk  Par-Pro | 02/21/07
No culture (as many trolls)  BregS | 02/23/07
You need to know what you talk about  Par-Pro | 02/23/07
your a little upside down....  whoop_123 | 02/22/07
I see Three different issues here  DonD01 | 02/22/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here