Microsoft don't do inter-operable
whisperycat | 02/02/07
|

Nice post!
SpikeyMike | 02/02/07
|
 
Well said, SpikeyMike.
999ad@... | 02/02/07
|

Microsoft bug?
KTLA | 02/02/07
|
 
Then why not...
techboy_z | 02/02/07
|
  
The intarwebs
KTLA | 02/02/07
|
   
Still, quit playing mind games, and tell us what you know. We do not have
DonnieBoy | 02/02/07
|
  
Straight from the horses mouth
quietLee | 02/02/07
|
   
Seems pretty weak to me. and I would also like to here from other sources.
DonnieBoy | 02/02/07
|
    
In this case, Donnie . . .
jlhenry62 | 02/02/07
|
   
Backstory
KTLA | 02/02/07
|
    
Give us a break. Microsoft should have fixed this a long time ago.
DonnieBoy | 02/02/07
|
     
Quit whining!!
jlhenry62 | 02/02/07
|

Right, the biggest thing that MS wants to do hear is be in a position
DonnieBoy | 02/02/07
|

They don't do standards at all
Imaginos1892 | 02/02/07
|

I'd be embarrased to submit a specification like this
stevey_d | 02/03/07
|
Don't use it
Boot_Agnostic | 02/02/07
|
OOXML is useless!!
techboy_z | 02/02/07
|

Who is M$???
Confused by religion | 02/03/07
|
Microsoft (MSFT) OOXML is useless
stevey_d | 02/03/07
|

Above?
KTLA | 02/03/07
|
 
any programmer who looks at the two Schemas can tell it
stevey_d | 02/04/07
|
Buy Microsoft Office now for full ODF compatibility
ihatelinux | 02/05/07
|