On TechRepublic: 10 biggest failures in IT history
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 26 of 39:
Next »
« Previous
COSS
Commercial grade software is very different to code "that gets the job done".

for example: I design embedded instruments and test systems both hardware and software, providing "turn-key" solutions.

the project im working on at present is a "Depth Sounder Test system". so i need hardware and software that can detect a PING, measure its frequency and duration, and amplitude, wait a period of time, and then send a return echo. To test echo sounders.

Ive designed the electronics, and have written the code for the "test engine", i can read the pulse (PING), and measure it, calculate period, frequency, duration, power and return a copy of that pulse after a (DEPTH) delay (1.33mS per meter).

The code is really nice, (IMO), works perfectly, and if it was ONLY me who was going to use it, i can (and do) use it in its form.

but its NO USE AT ALL, to a comsumer, or for someone who wants to test Depth Sounders, you have to be a programmer to set it up.

Ive also written all the hardware drivers for the keyboard, and LCD display, and writtin a USER INTERFACE, and put a great deal of design into ways to make the operation of the system FOCUSED ON ITS PURPOSE, i dont expect the operator of this equipment to know ANYTHING about programming, i dont even care if he knows he's using a computer, he just will have a display, knobs and buttons.
That he will be able to work out how to use, just by looking at them, and know what the unit does.

I expect him to have knowledge about DEPTH SOUNDER TESTING, and depth sounders. but not about embedded microprocessors, or low level electronics design.

Just like if i were writing a word processor, i would write it so that someone WHO KNOWS WORDPROCESSORS, would understand it just by looking.

The ONLY way to get programmers to do this "not quite so fun" stuff is to pay them, give them the incentive to invent and create to compete.

Users dont want to "USE" their operating system, HACKERS DO, but person typing pool, should be able to say "I can use wordprocessors". and be just at ease with OpenOFfice or MSOFfice.
Posted by: Aussie_Troll   Posted on: 12/04/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Novell will soon be the distro of choice  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/04/06
If it does become the distro of choice  Michael Kelly | 12/04/06
Doesn't have to be  NonZealot | 12/04/06
Technically, OOo is LGPL  Michael Kelly | 12/04/06
Don't think so.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/04/06
Did you bother to click the project link?  Michael Kelly | 12/04/06
Why would anyone use ODF?  Anton Philidor | 12/04/06
ODF is a good format  Michael Kelly | 12/04/06
Microsoft strategy  Anton Philidor | 12/04/06
You ask why?  John Le'Brecage | 12/04/06
Catching up on the news.  Anton Philidor | 12/04/06
YOU should keep up with the news...  John Le'Brecage | 12/04/06
Read the whole article you linked.  Anton Philidor | 12/04/06
I read the whole article...  John Le'Brecage | 12/04/06
The issue was not ODF but Linux...  Anton Philidor | 12/04/06
The issue was ODF...  John Le'Brecage | 12/04/06
And while we're on the subject of news...  John Le'Brecage | 12/04/06
A familiar refrain.  Anton Philidor | 12/04/06
Won't work this time Anton...  John Le'Brecage | 12/04/06
Skullduggery  Anton Philidor | 12/04/06
Summing up Europe for Anton...  John Le'Brecage | 12/04/06
Usually ODF is Mandated by Contract  mighetto | 12/04/06
Sounds like...  John Le'Brecage | 12/04/06
New Model "Commercial Open Source Software  Aussie_Troll | 12/04/06
Torvalds and Tridgell  Aussie_Troll | 12/04/06
COSS  Aussie_Troll | 12/04/06
Curiosity Aussie Troll...  John Le'Brecage | 12/04/06
re: curiosity  Aussie_Troll | 12/05/06
Burned at the Stake  perryroyce@... | 12/04/06
Assuming I traced the threads correctly...  John Le'Brecage | 12/04/06
Novell to support Microsoft Office documents  Loverock Davidson | 12/04/06
Okey, you do realize that OO.org  swoopee | 12/04/06
That's beside the point  Michael Kelly | 12/04/06
I have no idea as to  swoopee | 12/04/06
Just a second professor  Loverock Davidson | 12/04/06
Yes I do  Loverock Davidson | 12/04/06
Do you also know that OO.org runs on Windows  swoopee | 12/04/06
Problem with supporting OpenXML  orlando@... | 12/05/06
Precident of reversing one's recorded statement  Boot_Agnostic | 12/06/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads