On MovieTome: Why you didn't see Shatner in TREK
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 8 of 19:
Next »
« Previous
I agree
Yeah, worrying about supporting Microsoft's JVM is a pain, and so is dealing with people calling Java "slow," even though Sun's JVM has made incredible progresss in this area. It's because people are still using the ancient, outdated, slow Microsoft JVM sad.

Until people stop using Microsoft's JVM, we're forced to cope with badly outdated technology sad.
Posted by: CobraA1   Posted on: 04/15/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Doubled edged sword...  Mike Cox | 04/14/04
9.5  el1jones | 04/14/04
Not true name - This is not MS-JVM  FirstNLastN | 04/14/04
It is Microsoft java Virtual Machine  mtifo@... | 04/14/04
Your links  Michel Merlin | 04/15/04
This Hurts Java  dlu | 04/14/04
Good point dlu, Better to have no JVM than a crippled/slow one. DOWNLOAD IT  Plain Logic | 04/14/04
I agree  CobraA1 | 04/15/04
make up your minds  V Sanders | 04/15/04
Wonder of MS/Sun deal would allow delivery of Sun JVM - Not MS Crippled one  Plain Logic | 04/14/04
Gee, I can download, why can't you?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/14/04
If...  ryusen | 04/14/04
because the sun download breaks  V Sanders | 04/15/04
Step one - Embrace...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/14/04
exactly what do they mean by support,  ryusen | 04/14/04
it means if java need a little help with a security fix  V Sanders | 04/15/04
Yeah - if they feel like it  Robert Carnegie | 04/15/04
Java is to split soon  hipparchus2000 | 04/15/04
Java and IBM  AppealsIT | 04/15/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement