On last.fm: 2009 summer music festivals
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 32 of 74:
Next »
« Previous
Freaking ZDNet talkbacks, reply should actually go here
Damn ZDNet and their annoying Talkbacks! My reply, entitled
"Ah The Subtle Differences" should go here. I'll repost it, reply to
either one if you dare:

---Ah, so it's fine if others run to other countries to fight their
battles, but not MS. I see..---

Sorry, two different cases. Real was not pursuing a government
antitrust ruling against MS in any venue other than in the EU.
They chose one venue and wanted to get a verdict there. They
did not, as was the case for MS vs Lindows, run to every single
court in the world in an attempt to bully Microsoft through legal
fees. One case. One court. One ruling.

---And as I said, MS had little choice but to file suit in other
countries as a US ruling means nothing anywhere but the US---

Incorrect, as usual. Through our trade agreements, the US State
Department is able to get such decisions enforced with our
trading partners. For example:
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-5186626.html

"...when and if Lindows wins the U.S. case, "we plan to approach
the State Department and ask them to petition foreign
governments to invalidate the windows trademark, as they have
done for other generic computing terms."

See, it's not necessary to run around willy-nilly filing suit in
every single court in the world. That was a strategy from MS to
try to force Lindows out of business before a court could actually
rule.

---An as to it being a Genric name, that sir is nothing more than
an opinion until the appeals court gives us a ruling...----

Funny, you seemed awful confident about it when you declared
"the writing is on the wall". Are you backing down now? I've
cited plenty of sources and precedent that seem to indicate the
court will rule against MS. Care to provide any information to
the contrary?
Posted by: tic swayback   Posted on: 04/14/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

f them  timm_z | 04/14/04
business as normal  zijiang | 04/14/04
Linspire?  jdunn_z | 04/14/04
Interesting...  DigitalKid | 04/14/04
RE: Linspire?  JakAttak | 04/14/04
Looks like I called another one right.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/14/04
Re: I told you so  fuchikoma | 04/14/04
Yes, trademark disputes are handled in a court.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/14/04
Some other way?  fuchikoma | 04/14/04
(correction)  fuchikoma | 04/14/04
3 courts out of 4 disagree with you.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/14/04
the courts?  Joe Blow_z | 04/14/04
everyone know?  broadway al | 04/14/04
3 out of 4?  fuchikoma | 04/14/04
Wow, are you wrong  tic swayback | 04/14/04
Injunctions..not decisions  el1jones | 04/14/04
I'm confused  DigitalKid | 04/14/04
Generic words as trademarks  tic swayback | 04/14/04
3 out of 4 courts don't speak English!  John Le'Brecage | 04/14/04
So is Antitrust - what's good for the goose... (nt)  Fred Fredrickson | 04/15/04
Same arguement  richhayes | 04/14/04
Really?  tic swayback | 04/14/04
Aw tic, are you upset?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/14/04
I'm upset by unfair bullying intimidation  tic swayback | 04/14/04
You mean like RealMedia running to the EU?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/14/04
And MS has such contempt for U.S. courts  Jay Cash | 04/14/04
Hogwash, MS knows the US courts are the finest money can buy.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/14/04
Sorry, No  tic swayback | 04/14/04
Generic Term  richhayes | 04/14/04
Doesn't matter if it's a part or a whole  tic swayback | 04/14/04
Don't let that whiplash hurt your neck tic.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/14/04
Freaking ZDNet talkbacks, reply should actually go here  tic swayback | 04/14/04
Ah the subtle differences  tic swayback | 04/14/04
Wasted breath tic. Lindows is now LinWhatever.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/14/04
Not everywhere, and not for long  tic swayback | 04/14/04
who's bias?  ryusen | 04/14/04
No_Ax  AZflyman | 04/16/04
Don't break out the champagne yet  Robert Crocker | 04/14/04
Stay tuned Robert...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/14/04
Please explain further...  tic swayback | 04/14/04
Simple really...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/14/04
riding on coat tails  Joe Blow_z | 04/14/04
So you have nothing to back up your earlier statement?  tic swayback | 04/14/04
Ok, I can help here!  bmcgehee | 04/14/04
sorry, bmcgehee. You blew it.  John Le'Brecage | 04/14/04
Sorry, there is prior art  tic swayback | 04/14/04
Just the current facts tic.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/14/04
So, No Axe, you admit you're just blowing smoke?  tic swayback | 04/14/04
note:  ryusen | 04/14/04
Goodie  FilledOut | 04/14/04
Good of MS to put up all that free PR  jellyclock | 04/14/04
Looking for Lindows? Try Linspire  Loverock Davidson | 04/14/04
You don't help your cause  Jay Cash | 04/14/04
Sure I do  Loverock Davidson | 04/14/04
You contradict yourself in the links  el1jones | 04/14/04
No I don't  Loverock Davidson | 04/14/04
While your intent to defame is clear  IT_User | 04/14/04
Clarification?  Jay Cash | 04/14/04
Sure  Loverock Davidson | 04/14/04
Hmm, I have to agree  IT_User | 04/14/04
Windows Trademark  bmcgehee | 04/14/04
Still doesn't fly  tic swayback | 04/14/04
Here, let me settle it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/14/04
Have a good day, Axe!  John Le'Brecage | 04/14/04
Waaah! I'm taking my ball and going home  tic swayback | 04/14/04
Sorry, that's what we have courts for  IT_User | 04/14/04
Apple Computer is being litigated in England  drichards1953 | 04/14/04
Oh, they're no fun, they fell right over.  escoles@... | 04/15/04
SUBCHAPTER I  Update victim | 04/15/04
Company For sounds like Company Mor  FilledOut | 04/15/04
Consumers win  d_jedi | 04/15/04
Half measure...  d_jedi | 04/15/04
Free Linspire download  Peart_Wannabe | 04/16/04
goodbye _indows !  jvm | 04/16/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here