On MovieTome: Highest Metascore Streaming Movies
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 8 of 10:
Next »
« Previous
I agree
After all, isn't it considered OK to arrive at a product that performs the same function, as long as the code wasn't plagiarized? I really don't think that it is possible to get a patent on the _concept_ of intelligently parsing spoken words based on context.
Posted by: uberpinguin   Posted on: 11/09/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

another blah software patent... why? unless the code is word for word..  Been_Done_Before | 11/09/06
another common crook  Mectron | 11/09/06
Last I heard...  Confused by religion | 11/09/06
Why software patents suck  shagbark | 11/09/06
Some change might be coming.  jskline0@... | 11/09/06
I share your optimisim, but...  uberpinguin | 11/09/06
Prior art: human speech recognition  Taz_z | 11/09/06
I agree  uberpinguin | 11/09/06
..and another thing...  uberpinguin | 11/09/06
All patents must die [nt]  Omch'Ar | 11/09/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc