On MovieTome: Why you didn't see Shatner in TREK
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 19 of 19:
« Previous
I agree
The bottom line is all that matters in business, and open-source's only real revenue stream is support contracts. Once those streams rise to a level that looks promising to larger companies then they will offer support and drive out less competitive offerings.

OSS's fundamental drawback is that once it becomes attractive to proprietary software companies as a revenue stream then they have the resources to realize the stream even if they have to take a hit in the near-term. This means that the company whose primary business is support cannot compete and will go away.

Also the OSS "community" is quick to break-off support for a project they feel is being too capitalized.

One question I have is:
If you get software for free and purchase a support contract and if the support contract costs more than the comperable proprietary software is it worth it?

In my mind if software needs support then the software might not be as good as it should be; therefore, why would anyone want the software or want to contribute to the software.

I think that OSS is potentially very powerful, but also a house of cards. If a project is very useful and cool then there will be many contributors, but if there are relatively no flaws with the project then there will be very little in the way of support contracts. This lack of contracts will deter larger proprietary companies, but will also subject the project to plundering by a larger company that seeks to capitalize it.

In reality larger platform projects become so complex that support contracts become a revenue stream thus creating at least some barrier to plundering, but successful OSS projects become their own worst enemy due to their success. Business wants someone to go to if they encounter issues with the OSS, even a small issue could cost millions of $$ per day, but if that is the only issue and no one is there to support it right away then that is a problem.
Posted by: THEE WOLF   Posted on: 11/27/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

It's a good thing...  rapson | 10/27/06
It's a good think  nomorems | 10/27/06
And today's Evil is...?  DaveHowe | 10/29/06
Arrogance  Tim Patterson | 10/27/06
zealots...  frgough | 10/27/06
Support model?  DaveHowe | 10/29/06
Windows is the future...  Mike Cox | 10/27/06
rotflmao  bruce_mcculley@... | 10/27/06
I've said it before and I'll say it again  jorwell | 11/15/06
Red Hat is only a penguin, not a flock of Penguins  startx.jeff | 10/27/06
Slackware  Linux_4u! | 10/27/06
And how long will they be able to stay in business?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/06
Vendor Supported Stack  DaveHowe | 10/29/06
Honestly, I wondered when it would happen.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/06
Happened a long time ago  Richard Flude | 10/29/06
24% drop in stock says your wrong.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/30/06
That sound you heard was IBM  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/29/06
Oracle becoming MS?  Mark Miller | 11/06/06
I agree  THEE WOLF | 11/27/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More