FCC to look at digital radio piracy?

TalkBack 1 of 2:

Next »

• Thread View
• Flat View

Had 3 stories

in last 4 hrs with FCC conodrums.

Again,the FCC has yet a legal relationship between the applicability of 'radio recording w/o having a precedent whereby it was said that recording a radio broadcast was in fact 'illegal by law.

The FCC then points to situation of ''the recording industry''. But fact is when tape was used a 'royalty was paid on the blank tape by consumers. Point here being 'fashionable to 'record radio broadcast.

What is not 'fashionable is the relationships for wich 'digital as-a-medium,is to the hardrive(or storage device) - the same as that of the cassette. With a change being the fact instead of mailing,walking-or bussing over to a friends house of doing so , the relationship of digital broadcasts AND INTERNET is raised because of the communicative 'CARRIER that the INTERNET IS.

Why is it so baffling to the FCC that yes recording and medium are not as limbo - as it is with 'passing the recorded medium via a communicative device ? They have nothing to do with each other at the outset,but the imagined quantifyable utility of wich digital information can be thought - Is EXACTLY WHAT THE FCC IMAGINES?!!

No way jose. Without the unubiqutous relationship in the utility of digital information in recorded form,the INTERENT IS THE INTERNET!!!

If digital radio does not offer the same utility of wich was that of the previous set of relationship in recording,how is it that this is said to be the benifit of its use ?

Its a pretty awesome assumption that RIAA and its cohorts intend liberalizing home-made recordings for there own from the ambivalance of 'broadcast in digital form. Its another thing to basically confiscate the technology on the basis of a copyright accusation that has neither precedent or relationship to either the FCC,and/or RIAA. The relationship is to the person doing so. And that my friend is the question.

The broadcast flage,and 'digital radio in this form violates the constitution - in the most radical extent. While on the lowest least common denominator in the royalty flux,even though RIAAs 'totality is questionable, the idea that the 'totality of royalty in digital technology belongs to them as well is questionable.

The utility in digital stands to gain from those that would benifit from the technology. Neither copyright law,nor copyright holders have been briefed on the benefits of 'new standards within the 'utility (because coincidently the measure of utility wich RIAA sees is purely contractual 'effects via liscencing) for their copyrighted effects.

Then there is the double-dribble about ''a device must pay a liscence fee in order to playback'' - here your speaking of 'patent law. Still as well when the change is due - it is due to the artists AND consumers to benifit from the utility of what is made through component digital.

When RIAA IS a monopoly in TRUST. It should be noted that some of that does not concern them,wether it be patent,copyright,or liscencing.Of what should concern them,is just what can be told is said that a consumer can utilize through the benifits of a technology,and what that technology offers THEM.

The "HIDING"" of the digital utilities.What digital technology offers is not only an arcaich means of positioning a business responsible for doing so,it may be noticed that some may not prefer to be 'fooled again.

Broadcasting digital information over vast areas wich correspondingly control the functional aspects of them should be noticed with some corrosponding aprehension. Because it seems that not only does this tend to vacate the privacy and person, it does so openly ambivalently - without regard to the preposition that new technologies involve at the outset.

Again no court has EVER had a case of person recording 'radio. Digital does not change that.RIAA or the FCC will have to prove the case that THIS IS ILLEGAL in a way that the person involved namely consumers will be able to match the 'CASE'' being usurped here . (case(2),case(2))

Consumers are as much a part of RIAA as RIAA is to themselve. Technology component makers are getting keenly aware of the descreprency of components wich are performance based,and those that are 'standard RIAA components.

RIAA has rarely led to compromise.Because it does not negotiate something of wich it cannot benifit. This I tend to agree with.

-just talking.

Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 04/07/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Reducing Server Total Cost of Ownership with VMware Virtualization Software VMware VMware virtualization enables customers to reduce their server TCO and ... Download Now
• Five Steps to Determine When to Virtualize YourServers VMware Server virtualization isn't just for big companies. Entry-level ... Download Now
• The True Costs of Virtual Server Solutions VMware In an economic environment that is repeatedly heralding the message "do ... Download Now