RealNetworks gets bearings after EU ruling

TalkBack 12 of 38:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

You call this proof?

----The EU action was taken based on the idea that Microsoft's bundling of WMP into Windows has harmed Real. If Real has been succeeding, as the article states, where's the harm?----

So your logic is that since MS was unable to totally destroy Real that no harm was done? That makes about as much sense as saying that since the person you shot didn't die then no harm was done.

The fact that Real has been able to grow their market in spite of MS blatant effort to destroy them is a testament to their product. Where is the proof that, were it not for MS illegal tactics, Real wouldn't have grown at twice the rate?

I suppose you also believe that not being caught telling a lie is the same aa telling the truth.

What other MS philosophy do you have to share with us?

Posted by: zd-spam   Posted on: 04/07/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• IBM Smart Business Time Savings Test IBM If time is money - is your organization in need of a way to save both? ... Download Now
• Why Isn't Server Virtualization Saving Us More? A Few Small Changes May Dramatically Increase Your Efficiency VMware Companies have rapidly adopted server virtualization over the past few ... Download Now
• Busting the myths about QuickBooks Enterprise Solutions and IBM Smart Business IBM So you already know there aren't actually any alligators in the New York ... Download Now