On CHOW: Groundbreaking hangover cure
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 7 of 38:
Next »
« Previous
Still spreading the MS FUD I see
--- Aren't the free/open source proponents proclaiming that all software should be free, and only support and services will be paid for? ---

Actually that is a piece of FUD created by MS & shills of MS so they can create FUD against it. Really pitiful when MS has to fabricate stories so they can create FUD.

OSS folks don't give a rat's a$$ what MS charges for their mediocre 'me too' products, or what anyone else charges for their stuff. The fact the OSS folks write their own software is absolute proof your clams are false, otherwise, why would they write their own software?

The real hypocrites are the MS folks. Where would MS services for unix be without the free software MS based it on? Where would MS be if they had to write their own TCP/IP stack instead of using the free BSD version? Where would MS active directory be without the free LDAP and kerberos software it's based on?

It seems that MS philosophy is everyone but MS should have to pay for software. MS thinks it should be able to take advantage of free software, which they do every day, to gouge others out of money.

The OSS folks simply say they should be able to write their own software and, if they desire, give it away. This is what MS, through it's proxy, SCO, is attempting to destroy. This is the basis for the entire MS FUD machine. Nobody should be able to write their own software unless MS can use it to make money.

What puzzles me about it is how willing the MS shills are to pay MS sinfully high prices for software MS gets for free. That is the difference between the MS shills and the OSS people. The OSS people are not hypocrites that want to gouge everyone.
Posted by: zd-spam   Posted on: 04/07/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Just a question  rapson | 04/07/04
shhhhhhhhh  myndlon@... | 04/07/04
Good point  rapson | 04/07/04
re: advocates  ryusen | 04/07/04
Thank you for clarifying  rapson | 04/07/04
my pleasure  ryusen | 04/08/04
Still spreading the MS FUD I see  zd-spam | 04/07/04
stupid car anaolgy:  ryusen | 04/07/04
(nt) VERY stupid!  d_jedi | 04/07/04
but is it wrong?  ryusen | 04/07/04
Referring to Real's claims  rapson | 04/07/04
You call this proof?  zd-spam | 04/07/04
Hmmm -  Confused by religion | 04/07/04
The REAL question...  Stewart Cannon | 04/07/04
The REAL question...  zd-spam | 04/07/04
product versus service  myndlon@... | 04/07/04
Propaganda (false) about Real distribution.  Anton Philidor | 04/07/04
Do YOU use RealPlayer?  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 04/07/04
Only when I have to  richhayes | 04/07/04
Maybe, Maybe not...  el1jones | 04/07/04
Maybe... not  d_jedi | 04/07/04
What's the big deal with bundling  voska | 04/07/04
what if...  ryusen | 04/07/04
Then use Linux  rapson | 04/07/04
stuck on windows?  ryusen | 04/08/04
Inferior? Maybe Video for not lowband Audio Codec  brenthawkinsmd | 04/07/04
only when i have no choice...  ryusen | 04/07/04
Is shilling for MS your day job?  zd-spam | 04/07/04
Why Real Player is a bad product:  I know everything | 04/07/04
Real Is Staffed with Stupidity  brenthawkinsmd | 04/07/04
Solution  d_jedi | 04/07/04
You know everything, huh?  zd-spam | 04/07/04
M$ and REAL both suck  GrumpyOldMan | 04/08/04
MP 6.4  ryusen | 04/08/04
Still would ask judge to ask consumers  FilledOut | 04/07/04
Not on my machine!  BitTwiddler | 04/08/04
Hey wow a US company happy about the EU ruling  hipparchus2000 | 04/08/04
just because YOU don't like RealPlayer  hipparchus2000 | 04/08/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here