On BNET: Bag a raise in a recession
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 34 of 85:
Next »
« Previous
I guess that's the point
IBM is no better than MS. They both share an interest in marketshare and it's everyday business to market your own version of an existing product. Rare is the for-profit company that does not try to gain as much marketshare as possible. They are doing so for their investors, to keep people employed and to provide their product to as many people as possible. That's a normal day in any American business and it gets tiring to hear the rhetoric from the extremists who see no other vision than their own, no other ways of doing business will do, and they won't rest until they've made sure that is the case.
It's those people that need to maybe take a look at their lives and see if maybe they should try and date or have a family or something maybe to distract them now and then you know from a life's obsession of bringing down capitalism as we know it in America. They do share a very common goal with other radicals after all.
Posted by: xuniL_z   Posted on: 10/10/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Funny Uncles  Yagotta B. Kidding | 10/09/06
Just when you thought...  zkiwi | 10/09/06
Simply Outrageous!  D. T. Schmitz | 10/09/06
Crows are going extinct.  Henaway | 10/09/06
Is Goldfarb one of the theorists?  John L. Ries | 10/10/06
Investor outlines SCO-Microsoft link  Loverock Davidson | 10/09/06
Well...  zkiwi | 10/09/06
Doubtful  Loverock Davidson | 10/09/06
In terms of veracity  zkiwi | 10/09/06
Either way it still doesn't matter  Loverock Davidson | 10/09/06
Actually...  zkiwi | 10/09/06
MSFTs attack dog  systemx | 10/09/06
RE; In terms of veracity  barstewards | 10/10/06
Groklaw *is* biased against Microsoft  wolf_z | 10/10/06
Rogue  Yagotta B. Kidding | 10/10/06
Well, so as you know  zkiwi | 10/10/06
Consider it like SCO vs IBM  nucrash | 10/10/06
If you don't want Groklaw's copy  Yagotta B. Kidding | 10/10/06
This would be why...  John L. Ries | 10/10/06
Forget what Groklaw says, read the court papers...  Physco Dude | 10/10/06
Ah..  firehound | 10/10/06
Loverock - The Global Village Idiot  BanjoPaterson | 10/10/06
Groklaw Bias  wolf_z | 12/19/06
the connections are disturbing to say the least  Zoraster | 10/09/06
Downright dirty  Roger Ramjet | 10/10/06
nice imagination  xuniL_z | 10/10/06
Well  zkiwi | 10/10/06
Here's your answer  xuniL_z | 10/10/06
So...  zkiwi | 10/10/06
Ok lets talk about IBM.  DemonX | 10/10/06
"Invented computers"  John L. Ries | 10/10/06
You said talk, not make crazy statements  xuniL_z | 10/10/06
On the other hand...  John L. Ries | 10/10/06
I guess that's the point  xuniL_z | 10/10/06
Besides...  John L. Ries | 10/10/06
But..  xuniL_z | 10/10/06
Xunil: According to the usual account...  John L. Ries | 10/10/06
"I was approached by Richard Emerson (Microsoft's SVP) . . .  Plain Logic | 10/09/06
"Microsoft did not want to be seen as attacking IBM or Linux . . .  Plain Logic | 10/09/06
FYI, the full declaration can be read on Groklaw. (nt)  Plain Logic | 10/09/06
Just more confirmation of what we already knew...  el1jones | 10/09/06
MS gets my vote for the most disguisting  Richard Flude | 10/09/06
Least admired, Most despised company of all time  Roger Ramjet | 10/10/06
You're right on one point.  John Zern | 10/10/06
More like....  Laff | 10/10/06
Microsoft linked to SCO? So what?  A.Typical Zork | 10/10/06
schmuck  bitfuzzy | 10/10/06
{+_}  xuniL_z | 10/10/06
Do you work for SCO?  zkiwi | 10/10/06
ok then  xuniL_z | 10/10/06
No it is not Unix based  Linux User 147560 | 10/10/06
No  zkiwi | 10/10/06
Don't take Linus' word for it  Yagotta B. Kidding | 10/10/06
"This isn't right - it's not even wrong" [attr. Wolfgang Pauli]  BanjoPaterson | 10/11/06
OS X is a bad example  rpmyers1 | 12/18/06
Prove it....  Linux User 147560 | 10/10/06
There is no need to prove it.  xuniL_z | 10/10/06
You really need to go back to history class...  Linux User 147560 | 10/10/06
Besides...  John L. Ries | 10/10/06
This is all moot  xuniL_z | 10/10/06
Nothing is moot  zkiwi | 10/10/06
Well  zkiwi | 10/10/06
are you nuts?  DemonX | 10/10/06
excuse me but...  xuniL_z | 10/10/06
maybe you're just too blind or naive to see it..  Monkey_MCSE | 10/10/06
Clarifications  Yagotta B. Kidding | 10/10/06
For those without a clue...  Rick_K | 10/10/06
bearing in mind SCO has had three years to try to prove this, and haven't  stevey_d | 12/15/06
This isn't about helping a competitor  Chad_z | 10/10/06
EU .... we know you are behind Linux and co  Donbans_z | 10/10/06
Well...  zkiwi | 10/10/06
Yes those damn Europeans in Novell... er ..oh  stevey_d | 12/15/06
M$ should be held accountable  Linux Geek | 10/10/06
Last I checked...  nucrash | 10/10/06
Whose 50 million?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 10/10/06
You got it bass ackwards  Physco Dude | 10/10/06
Time for a RICO filing against M$?  thetruth_z | 10/10/06
Liquidation?  jimbo_z | 10/10/06
How?  zkiwi | 10/10/06
The real suing will start when the SCO case fails ...  George Mitchell | 10/10/06
And some of the defendents...  John L. Ries | 10/10/06
Looks like...  John L. Ries | 10/10/06
It was Linux Geek  Boot_Agnostic | 10/10/06
Too much KoolAid  mosborne | 10/10/06
The story is still unclear  Mark Miller | 10/11/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here