FSF rebuts anti-GPLv3 claims

TalkBack 47 of 49:: Next »; « Previous

Thread View
Flat View

You love false claims because you love fairy tales. Try reality.: ken_ballard@... wrote: "Microsoft does not control 98% of the entire software market.."

OS is like oxygen for living creatures.

MS owns only 98% of world ?oxygen?. So, if developers do not like MS condition ? well, they have to live on remained 2% of ?oxygen?.

Do you know that software cannot live without ?oxygen? (OS)? And hardware (PC, etc.) without software is nothing? And computers control almost everything? And who controls computers ? controls almost everything? Looks like you, like a boy, don?t know anything about it.

ken_ballard@... wrote: "No, one company will not inevitably seize the whole planet.?

Sorry ? it will be just the ONE man and the whole World will be ONE company. If the majority is like you ? he will do it - INEVITABLY.

ken_ballard@... wrote: "There are all kinds of natural controls in place to keep that from happening.?

Since when a completely corrupted government is a ?natural control? against corruption? Please share - what a kind of ?natural control? do you know, which will restrict Bill Gates and corrupted by him governments (do not forget the FBI, CIA, ...)? Is it almighty Mickey Mouse?

ken_ballard@... wrote: "OSS/GPL is already globalized because it exists in every country, competing alongside closed-source companies and products like Microsoft, IBM, and many, many others.?

Let me teach you ? TOTAL globalization means ABSOLUTE MONOPOLY = total dictatorship/tyranny of the ONE = elimination of mankind at the end (it COULD be on December 21/22, 2012 thanks to the sheep).

OSS/GPL+ the system means NO dictatorship/monopoly, prosperity of mankind forever (while the Solar System exists).

Quite different, right?

ken_ballard@... wrote: "I've studied government and economical structures in college, so I'm curious to learn what kind of system or algorithm you have in mind that prevents corruption, because as far as I've seen (and I studied a lot), one does not exist.?

Finally you agreed that you don?t have necessary education on the topic. It means you have to get numbers of lectures from me on the topic, otherwise, with all you education, you will understand nothing about that certain algorithm that prevents corruption. But you gave ZERO reasons to me to do this (lectures).

ken_ballard@... wrote: "You are no superior to anyone, so stop trying to force it.?

Is knowledge of a Nobel Prize nominee in quantum physics superior to a dilettante?s one? Same is with you ? you showed that you are a dilettante in this area. If you have doubts ? let?s check it. Do you mind to see who?s who in logic (you vs. me)?

ken_ballard@... wrote: "By your own words, this algorithm will only prevent corruption, not eliminate it. So by my own words, I am still correct in that nothing can completely prevent or eliminate corruption.?

That?s why I am talking about the system, not just one certain algorithm. You do not pay attention to what you read again, or your logic is flawed, or you have memory problems, or all together. Can you specify what the problem do you have?

ken_ballard@... wrote: "Being an evolutionist does not make me lower than you by any definition.?

But is doesn?t mean that you do NOT want to screw your life [u ]subconsciously. Do you know what drives you (your brain activities)? So far you have no clue about it (I am not talking about sex, money, etc., but what drives your desires of sex, money, ... and this is not genes, God, Evil and whatsoever you can imagine).

ken_ballard@... wrote: "And no, I'm not out to screw my life. I'm here just to live and try to live the best life I can provide for myself.?

Same was with Marilyn Monroe ? what she did, was completely the opposite to what she wanted (do not forget - same with you, ken_ballard@...).

The difference between you and Marilyn Monroe: because she reached the top of our society ? the cost of her mistakes was much higher than yours ? 4 unsuccessful suicides and only 5th was successful, but with external ?help?.

ken_ballard@... wrote: "I never said that the stock market did not react to 9/11. I never said that. I just said that the stock market was already in decline before 9/11. Again, you just make an invalid assumption.?

You just do not pay attention to what you read or have lack of logic/memory/...

You wrote that I was wrong about the $7-billion wealth-increase of Bill Gates after 9/11 because: ?Microsoft stock and the entire stock market were declining before 9/11. And the rest of your statements on that mark are so absurd as to be unworthy of any comment.?

When you wrote it ? you were as smart as a 5-year-old boy. Why? Because your claim supports my statement, but you believe it eliminates ... Or you still did not get it?

ken_ballard@... wrote: "Yes plants do compete.?

Again - you do not pay attention to what you read because it?s too complicated for your level of logic. It looks like your mind cannot fit big pictures at all.

The point was ? the GOAL of creation (but you did not get it).

Plants were not created to compete. Competition is just a tool, not the purpose.

And the purpose of human existence is not to compete either. Read again my previous post.

ken_ballard@... wrote: "And in regard to Bill Gates, the only thing you have is speculation. You cannot possibly back up your answers with anything concrete, or if you can, I'd love to see credible sources cited.?

Please, ken_ballard@... , pay attention to following: you do NOT know any information regarding wealth of Bill Gates right after 9/11.

But ...

You, like a religious fanatic believe that Bill Gates did not earned $7billions right after 9/11.

Thus you insist that e.g. Forbes Magazine has nothing concrete when they publish wealth of the richest men on the planet (they wrote about the $7-billion increase of Gates? wealth after 9/11).

And then what source of information is concrete and credible in your understanding? G.W. Bush?s words?

It makes you not too much different with suicide bombers ? they also, like you, believe in what they want and do not want to see reality at any cost as you do.

E.g. please tell me why do you claim (as absurd) that the Anthrax-letters with US-made Anthrax were not by the owners of pharmaceutical companies (Bill Gates and others) to make money on an antibiotic Cipro?

Please, enlighten the public how the terrorists got US-made Anthrax? Maybe poltergeist?

You posts means that you are on the side of the guys who made 9/11, the Anthrax-letters, etc. = you support/COVER-UP the most brutal terrorism in the World.

I would like to see your excuses.

ken_ballard@... wrote: "Plain and simple, you can't. You have nothing but speculation or sources that are spouting speculation.?

Of course you have rights to believe in all your fantasies you want, like they are real, but remember - this is not healthy for your mind.

You act like a man who just came from the forest and has no clue about what is going on in this World and how to get valid information.

Do you need my help to search the Internet? Or you have enough brains to learn it on your own?

Do you have a membership in a library?; Posted by: Vily Clay Posted on: 09/30/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use