On mySimon: Christian Louboutin Very Prive Pumps
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 16 of 21:
Next »
« Previous
Also...
...Your reading comprehension skills need some work. The link you gave me says nothing about the TCP stack in Win2k being BSD based. It mentions that parts of it are compliant with BSD specifications, but does not mean it was based on BSD code.
Posted by: toadlife   Posted on: 09/21/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Somehow...  HerbieHightower | 09/20/06
simple solution  Linux Geek | 09/20/06
Yes...  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 09/20/06
more choices are better  Linux Geek | 09/20/06
Do you have ANY proof of this?  Qbt | 09/20/06
This is not as simple as it seems ...  George Mitchell | 09/21/06
Even within the GPL world, LinuxCreep is totally clueless  A.Typical Zork | 09/20/06
Oh come on now.  Henaway | 09/20/06
you read too much EULA  Linux Geek | 09/20/06
I think what he's saying...  Omch'Ar | 09/20/06
It's happened before, it'll happen again  rpmyers1 | 09/20/06
Windows network stack  toadlife | 09/20/06
STFW first  galileon | 09/21/06
Perhaps YOU should have STFW  toadlife | 09/21/06
Thanks for the link  Patrick Jones | 09/22/06
Also...  toadlife | 09/21/06
Unfortunately, Linux Geek  ebrke | 09/21/06
Who wrote your script today  Boot_Agnostic | 09/20/06
IN the case of linux  toadlife | 09/22/06
I don't really see the problem..  Patrick Jones | 09/21/06
Why this is EXTREMELY important ...  George Mitchell | 09/21/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement
Click Here

SmartPlanet

Click Here