On TV.com: 11 Things U Don't Know About JOSS WHEDON
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 19:
Next »
« Previous
Patentable?
Apparently Google thought enough of the patent to license the technology. I don't know anything about the technology, but I do know that it has a patent.

By the way, I absolutely abhor the concept of software patents, but that is an issue for the legislature, not the courts.
Posted by: vferrara   Posted on: 03/30/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Let's see now  Taz_z | 03/30/04
heheheheeeeeee  will01gt | 03/30/04
Patentable?  vferrara | 03/30/04
OK, you got me...a little  Taz_z | 03/30/04
What patent?  d_jedi | 03/30/04
You are right of course about no patent being mentioned  Taz_z | 03/30/04
patents..  d_jedi | 03/30/04
What can be "patented"?  edjsch | 04/01/04
I wonder if Microsoft is behind this lawsuit?  ordaj@... | 03/30/04
Oh please  George Jay | 03/30/04
Because they're greedy, controlling, and  ordaj@... | 03/30/04
Remember  will01gt | 03/30/04
Yes. Yes I do. And Stac. And Go. And Netscape...  ordaj@... | 03/30/04
Tough Bananas  George Jay | 03/30/04
That's not what they said  el1jones | 03/30/04
Read the whole story next time  rjrapier | 03/30/04
Some links  Nigel Johnstone | 03/30/04
Wow, look what Google stepped in  FilledOut | 03/30/04
Possible Defence  kld113 | 04/01/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement