On mySimon: Activision DJ Hero Bundle with Turntable
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 6 of 11:
Next »
« Previous
So what does this mean?
My Guess:

Media players that use the Media Player or Windows Media Player as DDL, DDE, OLE, Active/X, (D)COM component or whatever the current name of the MS component model is today, will require the installation of the MS Windows Media Player.

It will make things a bit more clear at the tech
level, users or OEMs will be anoyed, I guess.

Media Players that are implemented on some sort usable version of Windows API such as DirectX?won't require the WMP.

If, after 7 years of legal hassle, MS is forced to relase consistent and correct API specs, vendors might be able to develop better independent Media Players. But who cares
given such timeframes, MS will keep frustrate open standards, move hindering propriaty stuff around from os, api's, formats, codec's, and drm's etc (saying theirs is better) and in such a way that they won't be hindered by any sort of regulations...
Posted by: alexr_z   Posted on: 03/24/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

So what does this mean?  rapson | 03/24/04
WMP not the issue  IT_User | 03/24/04
But that still leaves the question  rapson | 03/24/04
what they have to do?  NemesisNL | 03/24/04
I don't think there's an a priori answer  IT_User | 03/24/04
So what does this mean?  alexr_z | 03/24/04
How does that help consumers?  WhoIsDaMan | 03/24/04
Plain and simple...it doesn't.  Stewart Cannon | 03/24/04
and the End Result?  Stewart Cannon | 03/24/04
Finally a solution that will open up inter-operability  Richard Flude | 03/24/04
Getting Ahead of Ourselves Here  TeWaitere_z | 03/25/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

SmartPlanet

Click Here