EU's statement on Microsoft

Wrong: Past infractions are always used as a basis of judgment towards a defendant's future actions. If a rapist gets out and rapes another and gets caught, of course his prior conviction will be taken into account with respect to how he is dealt with in the future. That's just common sense Bit. You'll learn about this when you take law class your senior year. Besides, we just bombed a country based on what they "might" do in the future, so I don't see why the concept can't be used for something that is obviously less of a crime than mass murder.; Posted by: Teddy Tubesteak Posted on: 03/18/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Reply to Story Reply to Message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Roast the Microsofties! Teddy Tubesteak | 03/18/04

no kidding! stephen732@... | 03/18/04

exactly Teddy Tubesteak | 03/18/04

There will be NO PUNISHMENT. No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/18/04

Don't get your hopes up Nigel Johnstone | 03/18/04

Impression ... Ardian Daka | 03/18/04

Settlement Ardian Daka | 03/18/04

technical babble - LOL stephen732@... | 03/18/04

Reading comprehension? LOL Ardian Daka | 03/19/04

Wrong Teddy Tubesteak | 03/18/04

Future Conduct richhayes | 03/19/04

You may be wrong... MacCanuck | 03/19/04

What a joke..... snowsden | 03/25/04

What do you think?

Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
Produced by
ZDNet and