On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 27:
Next »
« Previous
Woopie
While it is good that M$ is following natural inuition in making one interface to manage all security settings the way one might do with group policy, with the growth of linux it is laughable to think they will grow that far beyond where they are already. M$ has displayed too many cards and toyed with too many people and businesses. They never try to work with anyone, and always immediately go for the jugular, whether in a legal manner or not. Even if Microsoft ever gets their OSes to the stability/security quality of linux (you know, the OS that's "not quite there yet"), they still have to overcome a hurdle that will never come to fruition. What is most poisonous about Microsoft is..Microsoft themselves. It is not so much Windows that is the culprit but the soulless M$ machine behind it. Potential customers will look at the options and see an unrepentant arrogant controlling monopolist on one side, and a free OS backed by a developer community that has no desire to control the computing industry to satisfy its own greed. The choice will be obvious. The only thing saving Microsoft hide nowadays is Office and the familiar top apps. Once these critical apps are ported so they run natively (and this is already happening as we all know), Microsoft, other than its ubiquity, will have NO advantage. Then the real fun will begin! Flame on, you "dignified" shills..
Posted by: Teddy Tubesteak   Posted on: 03/17/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

what about?  ryusen | 03/17/04
It Might be there  Heatlesssun | 03/17/04
Woopie  Teddy Tubesteak | 03/17/04
Not another Linux good Microsoft evil post  Heatlesssun | 03/17/04
Get real  Teddy Tubesteak | 03/17/04
What are you smoking?  srw2020 | 03/17/04
It hinders productivity  NemesisNL | 03/17/04
Sure!  Heatlesssun | 03/17/04
Another point  Heatlesssun | 03/17/04
$50?  Louis Ross Focke | 03/18/04
re: $50?  Wolfie2K3 | 03/18/04
not really  voska | 03/18/04
you may be right  Monkey_MCSE | 03/18/04
rc1 of a service pack  JWatson77 | 03/17/04
Its called a serive pack, not a patch pack  Heatlesssun | 03/17/04
then then need to keep security seperate from features as promised  JWatson77 | 03/18/04
Securty app  Hamlet_z | 03/18/04
Patch Pack or Service Pack same thing  voska | 03/18/04
Too ugly  bjbrock | 03/17/04
(NT) ... kinda like putting lipstick on a pig ???  Plain Logic | 03/17/04
Not a big M$ either, but  DarthRidiculous | 03/17/04
Once again.  Gorgonn | 07/03/04
Does anybody find it iteresting....  ShadeTree | 03/18/04
re: Does anybody find it iteresting....  Wolfie2K3 | 03/18/04
This is not just about Linux  bjbrock | 03/18/04
Problem is foundational  bjbrock | 03/18/04
i'll beleive it when i see it?  ryusen | 03/18/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline