Who cares
Linux User 147460 | 06/30/06
|
Paul Allen's Vulcan Enterprise will Care
claytonmuhler | 07/01/06
|
Who cares
nomorems | 07/04/06
|
|
Time to crack another
Linux User 147460 | 06/30/06
|
|
Good point . . . That beer goes great when watching this smackdown... (nt)
Plain Logic | 06/30/06
|
Linux User 147460 | 06/30/06
|
|
And as SCO is comming out of the delusional phase the grave implications
michael_t | 06/30/06
|
|
Not-so-thin air
Yagotta B. Kidding | 07/03/06
|
|
Far reaching ramifications? Interesting.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/30/06
|
|
Copyright
IT_User | 06/30/06
|
|
I think you've nailed it here
Too Old For IT | 07/01/06
|
So the formula for Coke isn't patentable?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/01/06
|
|
Geee
TtfnJohn | 07/01/06
|
|
Please learn something about Intellectual Property Law!
B.O.F.H. | 07/01/06
|
|
So I should be able to make lawsuit and win even if I cant prove my claim?
CobraA1 | 06/30/06
|
|
Clarification on judge statements
Solid Water | 06/30/06
|
|
Let the courts decide if it is true or not....
Linux User 147460 | 06/30/06
|
|
Judge Brooke Wells
Yagotta B. Kidding | 07/03/06
|
|
Long and drawn out
bitfuzzy | 06/30/06
|
|
What do "concepts and methods" have to do with copyrights?
Michael Kelly | 06/30/06
|
|
This isn't a patent infringement case
John L. Ries | 06/30/06
|
|
you read wrong
NemesisNL | 06/30/06
|
|
"Concepts and Methods" basis for every software patent ..but
stevey_d | 07/01/06
|
|
Ramifications in Copywrite law as per software?
B.O.F.H. | 07/01/06
|
|
You should read before commenting
Chad_z | 07/01/06
|
|
Ha Ha Ha...
MmmBuddy | 07/03/06
|
|
And before that
Yagotta B. Kidding | 07/03/06
|
|
You don't pay much attention
John L. Ries | 07/03/06
|
|
A Needed Correction
TtfnJohn | 07/01/06
|
|
No_ax doesn't read Groklaw
CobraA1 | 07/02/06
|
|
More to the point
Yagotta B. Kidding | 07/03/06
|
|
i bet the judge is running sacred
barsteward | 07/02/06
|
|
It's amazing....
mdsmedia | 07/03/06
|
|
More likely, No_Ax is a troll...
Zogg | 07/03/06
|
|
No_Ax Missed The Point Entirely
MmmBuddy | 07/03/06
|
|
Your observation is Spot On - Good job. (nt)
Plain Logic | 07/03/06
|
|
I imagine you know by now you are barking up the wrong tree
Physco Dude | 07/03/06
|
|
Tiny little details
Yagotta B. Kidding | 07/03/06
|
|
It has always been the case
nomorems | 07/04/06
|
|
No_Ax, there are no patents involved
wolf_z | 12/18/06
|
|
As Judge said, It's like a cop accusing one of shoplifting . . .
Plain Logic | 06/30/06
|
|
Sad day for Intellectual Property...
Mike Cox | 06/30/06
|
|
So so .. 4.5 - Waiting to hear how your rep spins this !!! (nt)
Plain Logic | 06/30/06
|
|
5.0
John L. Ries | 06/30/06
|
|
Sorry your trollness, but
bitfuzzy | 06/30/06
|
|
Tweet!
John L. Ries | 06/30/06
|
|
Make it 10
John Zern | 06/30/06
|
|
Sorry your trollness, but
richdave | 07/01/06
|
|
8.75
nomorems | 07/04/06
|
|
SCO suit is now effectively over - Can't wait to watch IBM . . .
Plain Logic | 06/30/06
|
|
I'll do one better
bitfuzzy | 06/30/06
|
|
I disagree
hoiatl | 06/30/06
|
|
WAS is the key word
bitfuzzy | 07/01/06
|
|
|
