Sun: Open source is about self-interest

TalkBack 27 of 84:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

Poor, poor, poor Vili.

MageOfChaos wrote: ?Yes, Iosef Stalin, 25 million dead of all races, though he too had his own pogroms. Idi Amin, allegedly cannibalized his own people and put together a rather impressive body count. Pol Pot, roughly half of Cambodia's population dead and some of the most brutal repression ever seen on this planet. Mao Tse-Tung, had a fondness for little girls and was responsible for between 20 and 43 million dead, not counting the nightmares of the Cultural Revolution and other various and sundry bad ideas and instances of outright oppression. Kim Jong-Il I'll grant you because he inherited a lot of the damage, though he's very much a looming threat and is dangerously unstable as an individual. Pinochet, again, I'd put him lower on the list of nightmares. As far as my top 5 most evil people of all time, for one, it's difficult to narrow it down to just five, and for another, it's difficult to assign a rank to them. Frankly, at the top, it's difficult for me to tell which was the most evil, though Hitler was the most iconic of the evil men mentioned.?

Vili's third inaccurate statement: ?MageOfChaos, if you agreed with me that Hitler was the worst ? why did you write it? Thus, it proved that you, MageOfChaos, have memory problems because of your mental disease (as I wrote before).

?Can you MageOfChaos, say it simpler ? I am right and you, MageOfChaos, are wrong?

?Hitler killed only Russians ? 100 millions, e.g. each forth Byelorussian was killed by Nazis and now compare it to Holocaust ? only 74,000 died mostly from typhus. Plus the US and UK planned to use nuclear weapons against USSR - full scale war with using captured German soldiers.

?It means that the rest of your boys just cannot match with this alliance: Roosevelt ? Churchill - Hitler.

?If you, MageOfChaos, are too stupid to find the links ? I?ll help you.

?Thus, MageOfChaos, your first assumption is wrong.?

First, I never agreed that Hitler was the worst monster of all time. As stated in my earlier post, I find it difficult to rank monsters of that type due to the sheer magnitude of the evil each has wrought. Second, Hitler did NOT only kill Russians, and the true cost of the Holocaust was far more than 74,000. Also, the ranks of Russian dead were NOT 100 million. If you were in any of a number of European countries, including Germany who would know a bit more about the true cost of the Holocaust, you would be arrested for your grossly inaccurate statements. Thankfully for you, idiocy is protected free speech in the United States. Third, Roosevelt, Churchill, and Hitler were never aligned. This is merely the beliefs of someone with a diseased mind who truly believes conspiracy theories.

MageOfChaos wrote: ?Vili Clay's second inaccurate statement: ?But the main source of his power was the US (and less UK)? No, the main source of his power was his military and his charisma. While he gained power by force, the most that could be said of the US and UK's involvement in his acquisition of power was that they failed to act, and they continued on this course of inaction until it was almost too late. Still, in this case, inaction was more than terrible enough, though it wasn't nearly as responsible as you would have others believe.?

Vili Clay's fourth inaccurate statement: ?Just read about American secret societies and you?ll find ? Hitler was a part of it. Hitler became a part of the US and UK alliance against the World (the Soviets were the main target) and of course Hitler was not able to rebuild Germany without enormous help of the US (mostly Jews).

?If you, MageOfChaos, are too stupid to find the links ? I?ll help you.

?Thus, MageOfChaos, your second assumption is wrong too.?

Again, more conspiracy theory nonsense. Do black helicopters spy on you over the horizon? Do people send hidden messages to you in the TV?

MageOfChaos wrote: ?No. The actual translation is thus: I know better than to try to argue with the clinically insane, but sometimes, I can't help myself. This is such an instance.?

Vili's fifth inaccurate statement: ?But all the facts are against you, MageOfChaos. I?ll repeat it again ? ALL THE FACTS are on my side, not yours, MageOfChaos.

?Thus, by the facts you ? MageOfChaos is a hallucinating paranoiac who sees what he wants.

?Thus, MageOfChaos, your third assumption is also wrong.?

Actually, none of the facts are on your side. All you have are the ravings of a madman. Thank you for playing.

MageOfChaos wrote: ?No, again, the actual translation is thus: I was tired and didn't feel like wasting any more time on you yesterday, and at any rate, I felt it better to defer to those capable of expressing similar opinions far more eloquently. As always, you strike out, or to use terms with which you may be more familiar, you've earned a red card.?

Vili's sixth inaccurate statement: ?You know, MageOfChaos, if you'd not encrypt your messages ? you, like a sane person, would understand what you write, but you do not have this fortune. I am very sorry.

?If you translate YOUR post from English - then what the language is it? Ku-ku-house language of MageOfChaos??

It's called ?reading comprehension. Look into it. You could use a lesson in it.

Posted by: MageOfChaos   Posted on: 07/04/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Three Steps You Need to Know to Stop Data Loss Varonis Sensitive data exposed to misuse or loss... it is the stuff of nightmares ... Download Now
• The Impact of Virtualization Software on Operating Environments VMware Today's use of virtualization technology allows IT professionals to ... Download Now
• Reducing Server Total Cost of Ownership with VMware Virtualization Software VMware VMware virtualization enables customers to reduce their server TCO and ... Download Now