This article did not need to be on here
US Chistian | 03/16/04
|

Hence the reason it *IS* on here (NT)
Monkey_MCSE | 03/16/04
|

By the way...
Patrick Jones | 03/16/04
|

100% spot on!!!
No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/16/04
|

And anyone expected them to say something different?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/16/04
|
 
So tell me, 2 years ago, you knew Novel would embrace open source???
DonnieBoy | 03/16/04
|
  
(NT) Ignore them, They're just whining again...
Plain Logic | 03/16/04
|
  
Naw.. He is ticked off that...
Northwolf | 03/17/04
|
  
Re: So tell me....
cbradshaw@... | 03/18/04
|

And you expect what from this IT tabloid?
B.O.F.H. | 03/16/04
|
 
Here, for instance
Chad_z | 03/16/04
|

why not?
ryusen | 03/16/04
|
 
Exactly.
doe_z | 03/16/04
|

Who had the copyrights?
George Mitchell | 03/16/04
|
 
MS has SCO's back
GoodOyster | 03/18/04
|

This article did not need to be on here
NemesisNL | 03/17/04
|
Recognition of the obvious
Chad_z | 03/16/04
|
some SCO history
raker | 03/16/04
|
Blah blah blah Blah Blah
cygnet@... | 03/16/04
|
The real reason for Open Source quality
Fred Fredrickson | 03/16/04
|

In support of your assertion
Wm_Hayashi | 03/17/04
|
 
Re: In support of your assertion...
cbradshaw@... | 03/18/04
|
Novell did NOT tranfer Unix copyrights to (old) SCO ...
George Mitchell | 03/16/04
|
No..who
bjbrock | 03/16/04
|

No merit to your assertions...
techboy_z | 03/17/04
|
SCO
RPJr | 04/17/04
|