On mySimon: Christian Louboutin Very Prive Pumps
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 28 of 68:
Next »
« Previous
What applies to the US applies to Dutch courts as well...
"Now if any rogue US judge gave such ruling then he/she would redicule herself/himself because US law would not be able to execute ruling. It would be an idiot idea to force penalties on company seeking legal help in other countries while it operates on their markets via different business units."

So, it we substitute "Dutch" (or Sweeden or any other country) for "US", the courts ought not to be able to enforce penalties on Lindows (US) or to attempt to fine Lindows (Dutch) for actions of the Lindows (US) corporation. Which of course is exactly the case that Lindows argued in their defense in the Dutch courts: They have changed their advertising to abide by the court order in the areas affected by the ruling. However, as the ruling does not apply in the area where the U.S. has jurisdiction, it is improper to fine the company for the behavior of the US division.
Posted by: Rabid Conservative   Posted on: 03/17/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

greedy!  stephen732@... | 03/16/04
How about  JoeMama_z | 03/16/04
Does that mean Anderson windows pays  el1jones | 03/16/04
its not like we have a shortage of idiots in this world.  JoeMama_z | 03/16/04
exactly!  stephen732@... | 03/16/04
ok fine  JoeMama_z | 03/16/04
Lindows is a knockoff of a GENERIC term - perfectly legal  stephen732@... | 03/16/04
Poor analogy  sa_z | 03/16/04
huh?  JoeMama_z | 03/16/04
You're going way overboard  IT_User | 03/16/04
Only two possibilities  RedHat9User | 03/17/04
how about...  ryusen | 03/16/04
LMFFAO  Always Annoyed | 04/04/04
Jurisdiction?  vferrara | 03/16/04
If they were doing it to drive up cost for Lindows, yes, very ilegal.  DonnieBoy | 03/16/04
Be Verrrrry Careful!  becksdark | 03/17/04
Of course thhere is no jurisdiction.  FirstNLastN | 03/16/04
Microsoft is a US corporation, you bet US courts have jurisdiction.  DonnieBoy | 03/16/04
Sorry, your dead wrong.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/16/04
So it would be ok for MS to operate a child prostitution business??  DonnieBoy | 03/16/04
Is child prostetution illegal. is filing a law suit.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/16/04
Are you smart enough to realize that it's ilegal to file lawsuits sometimes  DonnieBoy | 03/16/04
It is if the Judge rules that you can do it  voska | 03/17/04
What weakens US courts?  IT_User | 03/16/04
But it's a US company  voska | 03/17/04
Better example...  Rabid Conservative | 03/17/04
US judges not that stupid?  stephen732@... | 03/16/04
What applies to the US applies to Dutch courts as well...  Rabid Conservative | 03/17/04
Belongs in a tabloid  US Chistian | 03/16/04
IT Christian is that you?  MkIIISupra | 03/16/04
ZDNet news is pretty much tabloid stuff for the IT industry.  B.O.F.H. | 03/16/04
Highly Critical of you  nucrash | 03/16/04
LOL (nt)  el1jones | 03/16/04
Here's an idea  IT_User | 03/16/04
he's not a Christian, he's a sneaky ferengi (nt)  stephen732@... | 03/16/04
Free publicity for Lindows, Negative publicity for Microsoft.  DonnieBoy | 03/16/04
Like Apple?  amicus_curious | 03/16/04
Apple was NOT generic in the computer industry, Windows was.  DonnieBoy | 03/16/04
exactly  JWatson77 | 03/16/04
Actually...  Rabid Conservative | 03/17/04
Actually...  vferrara | 03/16/04
Ever hear of Xwindows  sa_z | 03/16/04
try again...  stephen732@... | 03/16/04
Fair is fair  amicus_curious | 03/16/04
They asked for it.  Prognosticator | 03/16/04
leave the bleeding heart republicans out of it  stephen732@... | 03/16/04
"bleeding heart republicans"?  rapson | 03/17/04
When if comes to corporate welfare, it fits (NT)  mds_z | 03/18/04
As if the rest of the world listens to our courts.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/16/04
It's not an order against those courts  Michael Kelly | 03/16/04
You may be right  IT_User | 03/16/04
Hogwash!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/16/04
No, just confusion created by growing international trade  Rabid Conservative | 03/17/04
Wrong  voska | 03/17/04
Hogwash...NOT!  NottaFan | 03/17/04
Lawsuits as a business model  tic swayback | 03/16/04
Wheres John Carrol....  sa_z | 03/16/04
Windows, ooops Lindows, Lin___ oh just break  FilledOut | 03/16/04
Yessir!  syrynxx | 03/17/04
U work at Maxim?  FilledOut | 03/19/04
Lindows asks court to nix overseas lawsuits  Loverock Davidson | 03/16/04
What confusion? One works and you know about the other one!  brockster | 03/16/04
Which, Linsux or Winsux, maybe  FilledOut | 03/16/04
Windows name and fees..  MAC_95NTXP | 03/17/04
Was windows a "generic C  Sparkie_z | 03/17/04
Was windows a "generic computer term" before 1985  Sparkie_z | 03/17/04
Windows Trademark is invalid by US law  ITSa341@... | 03/19/04
So much for using sound alike in products  FilledOut | 03/21/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline