Feel free to share your code..
nucrash | 06/27/06
|
No thanks
Linux Geek | 06/27/06
|
Look but don't touch
whisperycat | 06/27/06
|

Okay, kitty-cat
Confused by religion | 06/27/06
|
 
I'll give you one, even if it might not be the last.
Letophoro | 06/27/06
|
 
I have found some
quantumstate | 06/27/06
|
  
What part of April's Fools day did you not understand
jmilne@... | 06/29/06
|
code-sharing site
not of this world | 06/27/06
|
Pls DO NOT get confused and believe that
michael_t | 06/27/06
|

I disagree
Patrick Jones | 06/27/06
|
 
Let us reason here:
michael_t | 06/27/06
|
  
As I stated
Patrick Jones | 06/28/06
|
Excuse me, but how does "shared source" differ from "open source"?
michael_t | 06/27/06
|

Easy..
Patrick Jones | 06/27/06
|
 
Ho ho ho ... incidentally, you are replying to my previous post
michael_t | 06/27/06
|
  
And again..
Patrick Jones | 06/28/06
|
   
and again I have NO problem whatsoever with that. If SUN was giving away
michael_t | 06/28/06
|
    
I don't work for them..
Patrick Jones | 06/28/06
|
I hear them talking tools
DemonX | 06/27/06
|
Microsoft Code of Conduct
bxj2006 | 06/27/06
|

Let's try that formatting again:
bxj2006 | 06/27/06
|
 
Here is one interpretation
Confused by religion | 06/27/06
|
 
its simple
not of this world | 06/27/06
|
 
its saying that
substand | 06/27/06
|
  
So uncompiled code is not software
quantumstate | 06/27/06
|
   
"soft"ware
bxj2006 | 06/27/06
|
WHO'S LAUGHING NOW
ghekko | 06/27/06
|
VB 6 run time.. where that? How about releasing protocol specs instead
john.gruber@... | 06/28/06
|

VB 6 run time.. where that? How about releasing protocol specs instead
Jacques@... | 06/29/06
|
I wonder...
Psyjack | 06/29/06
|
Back to the Future
3dguru | 06/30/06
|