On BNET: Bag a raise in a recession
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 8 of 44:
Next »
« Previous
Not necessarily
"Once a book is printed for any software it is
old news or outdated."

How is software different to any other technology in that regard? How is that relevant to whether or not a particular user should upgrade to Office 2007?

"Companies will adopt it because they will have
to upgrade anyways[sic]"

Why? I use Office 2000 and have zero issues with it - oh, you mean that Software Assurance will force upgrades. Why on earth are businesses signing up to a deal that forces them to upgrade? And charges them for it?

"Just part of the cycle, if people don't like change they they[sic] are in the wrong biz..."

So if a clerk in some company somewhere gets pissed off because they find it hard to use a new version of software that is supposed to make life easier, they are in the wrong business?

I think your priorities are back in the old mainframe days where IT people constantly delivered what they thought the customer wanted without regard for what was actually asked for.

We know what is best for you... resistance is futile... all praise the system...
Posted by: Fred Fredrickson   Posted on: 06/22/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

So those who signed the "s/w assurance" (right happy ) plan  michael_t | 06/22/06
Oh good heavens,,,,,  Cayble | 06/26/06
Let the complaining begin devil  Southern.Pride | 06/22/06
This particular upgrade  Michael Kelly | 06/22/06
Software changes fast  Southern.Pride | 06/22/06
re: Software changes fast  barsteward | 06/22/06
Not true..  Patrick Jones | 06/23/06
Not necessarily  Fred Fredrickson | 06/22/06
Most people probably don't need it  A.Typical Zork | 06/22/06
Agreed....  linux_for_me | 06/22/06
Have you USED it?  MungoGrubb | 06/23/06
So you are saying you have tested it  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/23/06
Isn't strange that it's been so quiet in this forum ? wink  michael_t | 06/22/06
We are in the washroom....  Cayble | 06/26/06
And WHO can justify the new cycle of PAIN ?  michael_t | 06/22/06
Only two new features?  Fred Fredrickson | 06/22/06
They're not making the real point very well  MungoGrubb | 06/23/06
If Office 2003 is an example of what to expect  Linux Guy 1000 | 06/23/06
If Office 2003 is an example of what to expect - corrected!  Linux Guy 1000 | 06/23/06
So much for re-training savings  Chad_z | 06/23/06
Surprisingly the press isn't looking or listening.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/23/06
Frontpage?  Sabz5150 | 06/23/06
Yeah, only 90% of users use it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/24/06
By the way, Frontpage is NOT used for web sites now.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/24/06
And yet, beta Office has more downloads  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/23/06
Curiosity perhaps?  DarthRidiculous | 06/24/06
True, many were curious about OpenOffice.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/24/06
OO works fine for me  DarthRidiculous | 06/25/06
Same here.  dave.leigh@... | 06/26/06
devil analysts  Boot_Agnostic | 06/23/06
Outlook 2007 on Exchange 2007 Worth It Alone  erniescar99 | 06/23/06
What about the lockups?  enduser_z | 06/23/06
Yes  erniescar99 | 06/23/06
Say what?  dave.leigh@... | 06/26/06
Yes, now multi-threading is in place to make  michael_t | 06/23/06
Zzzzz..Zzzzzz...Zzzzzzz....  Cayble | 06/26/06
Geezzz these are so darn exciting, so darn .... (yaaaawn) happy you were  michael_t | 06/23/06
Question?  interested_amateur@... | 06/26/06
No axe, really a parody?  DarthRidiculous | 06/24/06
Obviously you have a hard time reading.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/24/06
You make me laugh  DarthRidiculous | 06/25/06
Think before you leap  bergmystr | 06/26/06
Back to 2003  Headspin | 06/27/06
If. . .  Sheeva | 06/27/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement