P2P faces new legal scrutiny from states

TalkBack 8 of 45:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

Attorneys Generals Should Work On Privacy

of computers in general. However this cannot be expected from the side of law wich deals with 'written law - since the inclusion of law wich is yet to stated will either have to be written,or derived via precedent of legal case in a litigation.

If it was that 'privacy was 'key to realization of 'content determined to be from P2P - even if it was within the descreprenciy of 'usage of copyright material the delegation of 'liability would be turned from those wich are dealing in viruses,and destruction of personal computer property.

For now using the 'open persona of 'well the program is communicative,the computer code is volatile in its concept, will persist. Communicative code is volatile to a users computer. Because as soon as you recognize 'person of use to a computer,you also delegate 'person of end-use,wich has always in this respect pre-dated to the dinasour age technical relationships aspiring to be predator,and prey. Wich induce these volatile states. Imposing mischevous query 'not only on the machine,but on the person that utilizes the machine.

This would mean that the person has legal mention to arbitration rather than denial of that respect of law wich tends to provide useless the person,especially in interactions with laws wich give legal precedent to a questionable copyrights authority to do so.

Attorneys Generals are not looking at the right of person with respect of legal papers and documents in this respect.They are looking at the problems in respect of 'control of causes wich create those volitities. But without some kind of privacy initiative - the ordination in respect of this control would not be predetermined through law. It would be determined by other legal mention outside of person who should have those legal mentions.

__________

Not a bad idea in the whole.But it serves only the present necesity of participating Attorneys Generals . Where something should be noted for the privacy in persons of computer use,without confusing this of 'network,and 'network(ed),contributions. Wich tend to be maintained in completely different persona.


-just talking.

Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 03/15/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• The True Costs of Virtual Server Solutions VMware In an economic environment that is repeatedly heralding the message "do ... Download Now
• Why Isn't Server Virtualization Saving Us More? A Few Small Changes May Dramatically Increase Your Efficiency VMware Companies have rapidly adopted server virtualization over the past few ... Download Now
• Busting the myths about QuickBooks Enterprise Solutions and IBM Smart Business IBM So you already know there aren't actually any alligators in the New York ... Download Now