On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 28 of 31:
Next »
« Previous
Thanks for the Heads Up
Microsoft recently hired an Eclipse fellow that use to work at IBM. The article indicates that Microsoft is following IBM's lead emulating IBM's Rational Application Developer (new version 7 now available). IBM's product works great with Oracle though it has a lot of hooks of course for DB2. I am hoping Version 7 implements EJB's better, perhaps Ejb3. Supposedly the Visual Java is much improved. Anyway Microsoft is doing the industry good by attempting to leap from IBM's RAD. But they are so far behind.

Be aware that Oracle has decided to port its tool set to eclipse. The first port is likely to involve Oracle SQLdeveloper which is available free of charge in a Windows and all other OS flavor. The SQLdeveloper tool comes with native support for Oracle, MySQL, and Microsoft SQL Server. Oracle and Microsoft have been working together recently because of the recognition that many of their customers have both Oracle and Microsoft SQL Server. Oracle owns the engine for MySQL so it was natural to include that. I suspect that any database with a jdbc driver can also be supported by the tool. But clearly this is the killer application we have been looking for in Oracle database work.

Frank L. Mighetto CCP
Posted by: mighetto   Posted on: 04/06/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

DB Unit Testing  SQLServer | 05/31/06
The pros do NOT use a database ONLY available on one bug ridden OS  DonnieBoy | 05/31/06
Buwahahahaha  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/31/06
Typically just people without arguments, you insult when you don't have an  DonnieBoy | 05/31/06
Now see, DonnieBoy, if only you'd said...  Joel R | 06/01/06
Disagree  mighetto | 04/06/07
Interesting.  Joel R | 06/14/07
Donnieboy...oh cluless wonder  marksashton | 05/31/06
Yes, a lot of cluless people use SQL Server for small non-mission critical  DonnieBoy | 05/31/06
My God man!!!  BFD | 05/31/06
If you look at the ammount of important data actually stored, SQL Server is  DonnieBoy | 05/31/06
Alternative, yes!  MISsupport | 05/31/06
Well, alternatives to a point, but security should be number one.  DonnieBoy | 05/31/06
Yes, security is important but....  MISsupport | 05/31/06
Yes, the Linux ecosystem has yet to develop, and many must use Widows for  DonnieBoy | 05/31/06
"Many must use Widows"  jorwell | 06/01/06
And then there are the X-Widows  jorwell | 06/02/06
I totally agree donnie!  Yensi717 | 12/07/06
Both Are Free  mighetto | 04/06/07
Sorry, not right  qhris@... | 05/31/06
There are a lot of compatibility problems with SQL Server. It only runs on  DonnieBoy | 05/31/06
With Virtualization SQL Server runs everyware  mighetto | 04/06/07
I'm confused  quantumstate | 06/01/06
DonnieBoy, it's time to own up  jorwell | 06/01/06
Lets own up, Microsoft is now open source  mighetto | 04/06/07
RDBMS  JoeApprentice | 05/31/06
.NET sucks at database  OhMyGosh | 05/31/06
Thanks for the Heads Up  mighetto | 04/06/07
Now, see, DonnieBoy,  Joel R | 06/01/06
Pros dont use Access  kokuryu | 06/08/07
If Project Success Depends on MS Tools ...  dhettinger | 06/11/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More