On CHOW: Why are shopping carts so hard to steer?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 42 of 66:
Next »
« Previous
This will ultimately stifle innovation IMO
It seems like the idea of patenting an innovation has gotten so screwed up. Up until the mid-90s one could only patent a novel innovation. After that the U.S. federal government loosened the standard for patents. And now someone who puts a design on a friggin' TOWEL can patent it! I've heard the complaints about simple technologies being patented, and I sympathize. This stifles innovation. I assume this is what the EU is attempting to guard against, but the answer is not to disallow patents altogether for software. The answer is to raise the bar. Make it more difficult to get a patent, not in terms of rules and bureaucracy, but in terms of how a product or process is judged. Make the patent worthy of the name.

Software innovators are going to have a few reactions to this. They're going to develop their technology elsewhere, where they have patent protection. It's going to make the incentive to keep source code secret even stronger in Europe, since companies will say it's a trade secret. It will drive investment money away from software innovators in Europe, since small companies will not be allowed the potential of a temporary monopoly on their product.

Patents were meant to be a positive enabler for innovation. They were meant to reward, and encourage it, plus encourage the eventual disclosure of the invention. It was meant to prevent corporations from keeping inventions as trade secrets, as well.

If an inventor could patent their creation, it would enable that inventor to attract capital to further develop the product, expand its market share, etc. The deal was that they were allowed this temporary monopoly to reap their rewards, but eventually the patent would expire and the invention would go into the public domain, which would allow competition, and allow educational institutions to study it.

It seems to me that the West has lost sight of what patents are all about. Now it's just a tool for patent trading among large companies, and a way for them to put the squeeze on a small startup.

There are the "patent trolls", small companies (on paper, anyway) that sue large ones to extract payment from them, but I think they're the exceptions, not the rule. Usually the power relationship is in favor of the large companies in our current system.
Posted by: Mark Miller   Posted on: 05/24/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Europe sucks to the core  hopefulcoder | 05/24/06
Simple reason for that  voska | 05/24/06
It's simple  mobrien_12@... | 05/24/06
Yeah  Dumber_z | 05/29/06
Total confusion here  Loggies | 05/30/06
hehe great news  toxicfreak | 05/24/06
i agree, very cool  tridell | 05/24/06
The EU can't find their butts with both hands.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/06
Easy to be confused.  Anton Philidor | 05/24/06
What a strange response  nizuse | 05/24/06
Axey's and Anton's biggest problem:  OButterball | 05/25/06
Just flame bait  GrumpyOldMan | 05/25/06
Sort of ...  OButterball | 05/25/06
If you're having difficulty, please ask.  Anton Philidor | 05/25/06
Uh huh, and "pay for good work," ...  OButterball | 05/25/06
Don't feel bad Mad Ivan.  osreinstall | 05/25/06
From another confused sexagenarian  IT_User | 05/25/06
Curmudgeons...  Anton Philidor | 05/26/06
That's Axey for you  Shelendrea | 05/25/06
USA next  Nigel Johnstone | 05/24/06
I agree with every thing you said, but....  DCMann | 05/31/06
Yes. Quite.  znewt | 06/06/06
it must be made clear  Linux Geek | 05/24/06
EU is some kind of Police state  SouthernPride | 05/24/06
Message has been deleted.  Linux Geek | 05/24/06
Linux user and support here  SouthernPride | 05/24/06
Geek, don't go away mad, just go away.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/06
Geek is in the basement go to the light  SouthernPride | 05/24/06
Well, and where are you living?  Arnout Groen | 05/25/06
Just ignore him  Shelendrea | 05/25/06
NSA  Dumber_z | 05/29/06
This story is showing the opposite  quantumstate | 05/29/06
EU companies will patent their software in the states.  osreinstall | 05/24/06
Non-consequence  IT_User | 05/25/06
Isn't that the title of my post?  osreinstall | 05/25/06
Your post  IT_User | 05/25/06
There will be a change.  osreinstall | 05/25/06
those with patents must be feeling pretty bad  tridell | 05/24/06
Why? All those patents are validated.  Anton Philidor | 05/24/06
"Valdated" perhaps  IT_User | 05/25/06
The software I am currently finishing  stan@... | 05/30/06
This will ultimately stifle innovation IMO  Mark Miller | 05/24/06
software patents are unworkable anyway, because:  stevey_d | 05/25/06
yes Yes YES !!!  BanjoPaterson | 05/25/06
Agreed, acknowledging the validity of all software patents...  Anton Philidor | 05/26/06
SOMEONE'S thinking at the EU!  bahamude | 05/25/06
EU and Software Patents  dhopp@... | 05/25/06
Copyrights not patents  SirLanse | 05/25/06
Patents should be applicable to inventions  engineer-inventor | 05/27/06
This is laughable  Shelendrea | 05/25/06
Making everyone happy  Anton Philidor | 05/25/06
Nothing to laugh ..  mad-man | 05/25/06
This is what the USA needs!  kokuryu | 05/25/06
Don't stop at just software  Omch'Ar | 05/25/06
Hasn't Hepatitis been patented?  I am Gorby | 05/25/06
Finally something to the consumers  Nocturna | 05/26/06
Sigh... So much clulessness!  Jxn | 05/26/06
Added info.  Jxn | 05/26/06
I think you might be clueless.  osreinstall | 05/26/06
Soo?  Jxn | 05/29/06
So what?  osreinstall | 05/31/06
Its hard to know where to start with this one.  stan@... | 05/30/06
Seems that the US is not...[more inside]  BlazeEagle | 05/29/06
Patents more applicable than copyright  lrvaught@... | 05/29/06
No, it isn't  Jxn | 05/29/06
Hepatitis patent...  interested_amateur@... | 05/31/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Meet Doc