On CBS MoneyWatch: Stop listening to Jim Cramer
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 10 of 10:
« Previous
build it
A patent should be in force for a prolonged period only if the holder actually does something with it.

If they sit by and watch someone build, market and support the product then wait 3 to 5 years to go after licensing fees and damages in court they should be shown the door.

If I patent something and you launch a product or service the may be infringing it is my duty to file notice sooner rather then later to let you know of my claim.

That being said there needs to be a non judicial forum, as an initial method of validating the claim and negotiating a settlement if there is an infringment.

This should be a business to business process rather then a legal battle.
Posted by: Tom in Toronto   Posted on: 06/23/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

PTO = Doormat  SirLanse | 05/24/06
Spoken like a person with no pantents and no concepts  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/06
But....  Henrick Ericcson | 05/24/06
ROFLMAO  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/06
I have a vote  dabble53 | 05/24/06
What is an activist judge?  Hanover Phist | 05/24/06
Worth repeating...  Omch'Ar | 05/24/06
Which of your patents should be wiped out?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/06
No, no, no, leave it be, IBM needs to maintain its lead  Boot_Agnostic | 05/24/06
build it  Tom in Toronto | 06/23/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Meet Doc