On mySimon: Body Solid EXM 3000LPS
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 24:
Next »
« Previous
Windows 2003 Server is too old
The linux kernel updates on such a basis that is needed. Microsoft could never keep up. They take too long between releases. They go months between the time when they find a flaw and patch a flaw. Linux Developers are on the flaws and have them resolved in days if not hours
Posted by: nucrash   Posted on: 03/05/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

shorthorn? (nt)  ryusen | 03/05/04
we would of added to sp  JWatson77 | 03/05/04
The elegance is astounding...  Mike Cox | 03/05/04
Windows 2003 Server is too old  nucrash | 03/05/04
MS just cant compete with their releases.  Suicida| | 03/06/04
What!?!  Martin Marvinski | 03/06/04
Microsoft must be hurting for money, I guess...  B.O.F.H. | 03/05/04
Whooooooaaaa!  michael-t | 03/05/04
(NT) Will this be called "Windows 2003 Rebloated"?  Plain Logic | 03/06/04
Not that bloated  Suicida| | 03/06/04
Not really  zd-spam | 03/06/04
hmm  Suicida| | 03/06/04
Gentoo?  doe_z | 03/07/04
Yep 2004.0  Suicida| | 03/07/04
Remember Windows ME!  scoobies_snacks | 03/06/04
Windows ME workstation?  JoeMama_z | 03/06/04
I've seen it happen  Suicida| | 03/06/04
Stupid ideas, part two  AbsolutelyNot | 03/10/04
MS has simply condemned itself  michael-t | 03/06/04
Message has been deleted.  qwwq | 03/07/04
"www.LinuxCAD.com" doesn't belong in here.  GraysonPeddie | 03/07/04
"The form that will take is still being determined"  nite_w0lf | 03/07/04
"chose the form of your destroyer" (nt)  ryusen | 03/08/04
MS breaks record?  Richard Flude | 10/18/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here