On GameFAQs: Halo 3 ODST: Where's the last audio log?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 32 of 45:
Next »
« Previous
SCO is forcing Linux users to be illegal if we don't want to use their code
"'Cause we all know 2 days after they showed the code, the Linux camp would finish their move and replace any components in question."

D*** right they would. They don't agree to SCO's terms! SCO has NO RIGHT to refuse to prevent them from taking the code out.

THERE IS NO REASON WHATSOEVER WHY LINUX USERS SHOULDN'T BE ABLE TO REMOVE THE CODE IN QUESTION FROM THEIR LINUX DISTRIBUTION! NO REASON WHATSOEVER!

Suing is NOT a right they should have! Linux users agree: We do NOT want to violate copyright laws, and we do NOT want SCO's code in Linux!

SCO is, in effect, FORCING Linux users to violate the law if they don't want to use SCO's code, simply because we can't remove it!
Posted by: CobraA1   Posted on: 03/04/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Start yer engines, mi amigos!  Bobby Sskcat | 03/03/04
Obviously, you didn't read the article...  DarbyOhara | 03/04/04
You're not paying too much attention, either  CobraA1 | 03/04/04
of course...  ryusen | 03/04/04
Evidence of Microsoft's funding SCO's anti-Linux initiative.  wackoae | 03/04/04
Just one of what will be MANY M$-$CO "smoking guns"....  dicktaurus@... | 03/04/04
I'll show you mine if you will show me yours  Squawkbox | 03/03/04
As did IBM.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/03/04
It figures  Squawkbox | 03/03/04
It's a good thing..  Bobby Sskcat | 03/03/04
And that matters how in this case?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/04/04
Missed part of the article?  hortons@... | 03/04/04
What case have you been following?  IT_User | 03/04/04
Man would I LOVE to be in that court room!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/03/04
IBM isn't afraid of producing source code.  Zogg | 03/03/04
Can SCO prove their claim?  Squawkbox | 03/03/04
What makes you think they have a case?  Bobby Sskcat | 03/03/04
Nice post Bobby I'm proud of ya.  Squawkbox | 03/03/04
I doubt they could  CobraA1 | 03/04/04
my theory is...  ryusen | 03/04/04
Can IBM dodge the email and memo bullet  nite_w0lf | 03/03/04
The could say....  NemesisNL | 03/04/04
Aw C'mon ZDNET why'd you pull talkback on this story?  Squawkbox | 03/03/04
LOL  CobraA1 | 03/04/04
chances are...  ryusen | 03/04/04
And still no mention  NemesisNL | 03/04/04
SCO. producing code  crocd | 03/04/04
Within 45 days  NemesisNL | 03/04/04
This should clarify things...............  nite_w0lf | 03/04/04
Pure Strategy from SCO  toomuchgreeatea@... | 03/04/04
Actually Not!  ShadeTree | 03/04/04
SCO is forcing Linux users to be illegal if we don't want to use their code  CobraA1 | 03/04/04
Not forcing violation, because  Update victim | 03/04/04
you're forgetting something...  ryusen | 03/04/04
I hope so  CobraA1 | 03/04/04
No! Don't throw it out  Update victim | 03/04/04
Bring all fact?s in front of the court...  Chris.Papoudaris@... | 03/04/04
Code Transference - Mode and Direction - Linuxgate ???  webgecko | 03/04/04
Microsoft funding SCO's anti-Linux initiative.  wackoae | 03/04/04
44 days to identify the code  B.O.F.H. | 03/04/04
IBM had 7,200 witnesses?  Chad_z | 03/04/04
When Will They Convict Microsoft for This Ploy?  claytonmuhler | 03/04/04
Actually one could argue that MS is funding Unix development by paying SCO  balsover | 03/12/04
Nope  agramont@... | 03/16/04
We NEED the press here - try this ZDNET  UnivComputerGuy | 03/08/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here