On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 12 of 61:
Next »
« Previous
Well how about IBMs lawyers then
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20031102104937393
QUOTE
D. Open-Source Software and the GPL

21. Linux is open-source software. Open-source software is free in the sense that it is publicly available, royalty free, and users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, adapt, and improve the software.

22. Whereas traditional software licenses often reflect legal limitations restricting the use and reproduction of original works, the open-source community has taken a different approach to licensing. The open-source community, including SCO, resolved to license Linux so as to keep the source code publicly available. Due to the open-source nature of Linux, anyone can freely download Linux and many Linux applications and modify and re-distribute them with few restrictions.

23. There are a variety of open-source licenses, but the most popular is the GNU General Public License (the "GPL"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit H. The Linux kernel, and significant portions of the larger Linux operating system, are distributed under the GPL.

24. In fact, one of the most important decisions Linus Torvalds made was to develop the Linux kernel under the GPL and keep the source code freely distributable so others could build upon, modify, and develop programs for the operating system.

25. Whereas the licenses for most software are programs designed to limit or restrict a licensee's freedom to share and change it, the GPL is intended to guarantee a licensee's freedom to share and change free software -- to make sure the software is free for all its users. The GPL applies to any program whose authors commit to using it.

26. The GPL is designed to make sure that a licensee has the freedom to distribute copies of free software, receives source code or can get it if the licensee wants it, can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs and knows the licensee can do these things.

27. The Linux kernel is subject to the GPL as it is comprised of programs and other works that contain notices placed by contributing copyright holders permitting distribution under the terms of the GPL. The Linux developers' public agreement to apply GPL terms expresses in a binding legal form the conscious public covenant that defines the open-source community -- a covenant that SCO itself supported as a Linux company for many years.

28. SCO accepted the terms of the GPL by modifying and distributing Linux products. By distributing Linux products under the GPL, SCO agreed, among other things, not to assert -- indeed, it is prohibited from asserting -- certain proprietary rights over any programs distributed by SCO under the terms of the GPL. SCO also agreed not to restrict further distribution of any programs distributed by SCO under the terms of the GPL.
UNQUOTE
Posted by: David Mohring   Posted on: 03/03/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

One born every minute  doctormoriarty | 03/01/04
SCO deceit  rgriffith64@... | 03/01/04
Way to go SCO!!!  Robert Crocker | 03/01/04
Would EC1Services be in violation of the GPL?  David Mohring | 03/01/04
Strange that you ask ...  Ardian Daka | 03/01/04
So for the cost of the media plus distribution  David Mohring | 03/01/04
Wrong on EV1Servers.net  Ardian Daka | 03/01/04
Incorrect on GPL  David Mohring | 03/01/04
Wrong  Ardian Daka | 03/01/04
Read the Link adaka  David Mohring | 03/01/04
Ref: the link  Ardian Daka | 03/02/04
Well how about IBMs lawyers then  David Mohring | 03/03/04
Crocker is not a lawyer  Bill Weisgerber | 03/01/04
The "Data Protection Scam" and other crimes  David Mohring | 03/01/04
And neither is William Cheeseberger  Bobby Sskcat | 03/01/04
Neither is Boby the SS Cat (NT)  Ardian Daka | 03/01/04
Lame Bill, real Lame  Robert Crocker | 03/01/04
Crocker is not a lawyer!  Bill Weisgerber | 03/01/04
Bill Weisgerber is clueless: So Say IBM's Lawyers  David Mohring | 03/01/04
If you can't maintain context, you'll never succeed!  Bill Weisgerber | 03/01/04
The terms of SCO's UNIX-IP license violate GPL  David Mohring | 03/01/04
please explain your definition of a liscence  NemesisNL | 03/01/04
Make SCO pay it all back  nograin | 03/01/04
Don't count on it  Michael Kelly | 03/01/04
My Prediction...  BanjoPaterson | 03/01/04
havn't you knowticed  JWatson77 | 03/01/04
Wrong!!!!  vferrara | 03/01/04
In the meanwhile in Germany...  ghetyei | 03/01/04
... and probably not by coincidence, either.  Zogg | 03/01/04
Well...  TrollSlayer | 03/01/04
Sucker??  gordon@... | 03/01/04
The "Data Protection Scam" and other crimes  David Mohring | 03/01/04
Just a curiosity questions  vferrara | 03/01/04
Until we get real answers to the *REAL* curios questions  David Mohring | 03/01/04
Makes EV1 look stupid  Arrg | 03/01/04
Makes EV1 look like they care  Bill Weisgerber | 03/01/04
No, it makes them look reeeeeaaaallly stupid  Xunil_Sierutuf | 03/01/04
You have to pay to play  Bill Weisgerber | 03/01/04
They have paid...  ryusen | 03/03/04
Makes EV1 look like Microsoft lackey  David Mohring | 03/01/04
Na.. I still think it makes them look stupid  Arrg | 03/01/04
Their customers may not agree  issthatso | 03/01/04
No, it makes them look stupid  NoB$ | 03/01/04
Here's an example of how stupid it is:  Arrg | 03/01/04
Just another monthly press release.  gordon@... | 03/01/04
SCO excited about having customer  rgriffith64@... | 03/01/04
Blackmail is legal ... in hands of SCO ( MS ? ) (NT)  Vily Clay | 03/01/04
This is interesting  Chipper1963 | 03/01/04
SCO LIcense needed to run Windows  B.O.F.H. | 03/01/04
Microsoft has licensed the SCO IP  Bill Weisgerber | 03/01/04
"No," Sontag said. Microsoft merely licensed an API layer  David Mohring | 03/01/04
Microsoft to license Unix from SCO  B.O.F.H. | 03/01/04
It?s always interesting why people wanna be as blind as Justice (NT)  Vily Clay | 03/01/04
No it's not if you've bothered checking EV1Servers.net  Ardian Daka | 03/01/04
And they offer Windows servers as well  Bill Weisgerber | 03/01/04
my golly miss molly  JWatson77 | 03/01/04
So why did they switch to Microsoft?  ghetyei | 03/01/04
because it's a PR scam  Romanval | 03/01/04
They do both, silly  Bill Weisgerber | 03/01/04
Corrections to the article  Richard Flude | 03/01/04
Windows owns 25% of SCO, huh ?  bigbearpcs2 | 03/01/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here