On CHOW: Can you use the handicapped bathroom?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 2 of 12:
Next »
« Previous
Got it a little wrong.
First of all, you seem to think that the concept of the virtual machine came along with Java. Not quite. VM's have been around a while, and actually Java borrowed a lot from Smalltalk which predates Java by about 15 years. So, yes Microsoft borrowed from Java, which borrowed from Smalltalk. The VM is a very fundamental concept in computing, so to see Microsoft implement the idea isn't stealing in any way.

In fact, the one thing that Microsoft did add to their Framework or VM, is language independence along with OS independance. Yes, the Framework can run on Linux (Mono project), but Microsoft unfortunately is only intrested in Windows implementations at the moment.

All VMs hook into there base OS, otherwise, how would they run on the OS! And .Net DOES provide a "sandbox" similar to Java. Native code will NOT run unless is explicity made to run on a given .NET assembly.

To sum it up though, whatever you want to call it, a Virtual Machine, or a Framework, its just an abstraction that programmers have used for years. There's not way that Microsoft could get sued by Sun for calling a VM if they wanted, but I'm sure they didn't want the Java comparison.

The bottom line is however, that VM's do provide a layer of abstraction for software that has many benefits, and yes, Sun starting doing it before Microsoft. However, neither Sun or Microsoft invented the idea.

P.S. You really don't understand .Net at all if you think it has ANYTHING to so with ActiveX/COM technology. It doesn't. In fact, in order to even interoperate with ActiveX/COM technology requires a wrapping layer in a .Net application, similar to wrapping that you have to do with JNI.
Posted by: Heatlesssun   Posted on: 02/29/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Framework: not a virtual machine  solprovider | 02/29/04
Got it a little wrong.  Heatlesssun | 02/29/04
You missed my point  solprovider | 03/01/04
MS frameworks and other night time stories  michael-t | 03/01/04
.NET Framework defined  KeithRisler | 03/01/04
When criminals manufacture locks for the whole World legally ? ...  Vily Clay | 02/29/04
development tools  V Sanders | 02/29/04
The old "shift the blame" FUD  Xunil_Sierutuf | 03/01/04
Security for XP alone is meaningless  KeithRisler | 03/01/04
Great, if it works  issthatso | 03/01/04
Things that make you go "Hmmm..."  Netizen Kane | 03/01/04
Untrustworthy in any sense  michael-t | 03/01/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline