On The Insider: NPH at the GQ 'Men of the Year' Awards
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 12:
Next »
Framework: not a virtual machine
The .Net Framework adds the same functionality as the Java Virtual Machine. The new name offers a few differences:

1. It is not a Virtual Machine. It hooks into the Operating System as well as any other virus. It will not force programs into a safe area ("sandbox") as a Virtual Machine should.

2. By calling it a Framework, MS may avoid another lawsuit about its monopolistic policies. If it does not have the same name, maybe no one will notice that its prime purpose is to eliminate the Java Virtual Machine. MS had trouble because the Internet Explorer was definitely a browser, and Windows Media Player was definitely a media player. They hope that the lawyers will not notice that this one is really an extension to allow web-based programs to run locally, just like the Java Virtual Machine.

3. MS's first try with web-based programs was called ActiveX. Most developers avoided it because most users turned it off because of the major security issues. It is doubtful that those issues have changed, but this will be installed as part of MSWindows, so people will not be able to turn it off.

I do not know when the legal entertainment will begin, but I recommend that everybody avoid the ".Net Framework" as another security hole waiting to be abused.
Posted by: solprovider   Posted on: 02/29/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Framework: not a virtual machine  solprovider | 02/29/04
Got it a little wrong.  Heatlesssun | 02/29/04
You missed my point  solprovider | 03/01/04
MS frameworks and other night time stories  michael-t | 03/01/04
.NET Framework defined  KeithRisler | 03/01/04
When criminals manufacture locks for the whole World legally ? ...  Vily Clay | 02/29/04
development tools  V Sanders | 02/29/04
The old "shift the blame" FUD  Xunil_Sierutuf | 03/01/04
Security for XP alone is meaningless  KeithRisler | 03/01/04
Great, if it works  issthatso | 03/01/04
Things that make you go "Hmmm..."  Netizen Kane | 03/01/04
Untrustworthy in any sense  michael-t | 03/01/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More