(NT) Whatever happened to the "Put Up, or Shut Up" order from January?
Plain Logic | 02/27/04
|
 
SCO droped the part of the suit...........
nite_w0lf | 02/27/04
|
An effective way of dragging it out
IT_User | 02/27/04
|
|
You have it backward.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/28/04
|
|
Very true
NemesisNL | 02/28/04
|
|
bitty changes like the wind
NoB$ | 02/28/04
|
|
Hmmm... seems to be working
IT_User | 02/28/04
|
|
Must Be an Odd Monday...
BanjoPaterson | 03/01/04
|
|
"Certainly SCO must have a case"
IT_User | 02/27/04
|
|
subject to IBM's right to move against the amended pleadings.
nite_w0lf | 02/27/04
|
|
Maybe, and maybe not.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/28/04
|
|
An interesting sidenote
nite_w0lf | 02/27/04
|
|
Never ending story
OhMyGosh | 02/28/04
|
|
I don't agree with this
NoB$ | 02/28/04
|
|
IBM's code doesn't belong to SCO
dwjohnso | 02/28/04
|
|
in case you didn't know ... link
dwjohnso | 02/28/04
|
|
Three lawsuits?
k4_pacific | 02/28/04
|
|
As One Groklaw'er writes...
BanjoPaterson | 03/01/04
|
|
IBM - Classic Response
Chad_z | 02/29/04
|
|
DON'T COUNT SCO
V Sanders | 02/29/04
|
|
Baloney
Chad_z | 02/29/04
|
|
Of course that's literally true
IT_User | 02/29/04
|
|
Perhaps sooner
IT_User | 03/01/04
|
|
Must Be an Odd Monday...
BanjoPaterson | 03/01/04
|
|
(NT) This was a response to earlier thread...
BanjoPaterson | 03/01/04
|
|
testing 123
ScarryJerry | 03/01/04
|
|
SCO vs. IBM
rdwhitti | 03/01/04
|
|
SCO vs. IBM...rdwhitti
dbradt@... | 03/02/04
|
|
SCO
krolsen | 03/05/04
|
Doc delivers the scoop on today's enterprise content management, printer maintenance, and all other issues related to document management. It's the DocuMentor Blog.
