On CHOW: Is it OK to blow your nose at the table?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 6 of 29:
Next »
« Previous
bitty changes like the wind
---If IBM had blocked the filing, SCO would have simply filed another suit and that would start everything from square one.---

I recall you claiming SCO had an airtight case on the breach of contract.

You seem to be the only one on ZDNet that is truly clueless about this.

Have you taken a little time to actually read the pleadings? Not the PR fluff but the pleadings? IBM didn't oppose it because it's even more ridiculous than the claim they made before.

It, too, will end up a non-starter. Even the market is getting wise. The stock is still slipping. I don't thing anyone has ever put forth a more ridiculous claim of derivative. According to the SCO definition, Quickbooks is a derivative of MS.

Of course, you'll pin your hopes on anything. Don't think there is a more religious MS zealot anywhere. Certainly not a more anti-Linux zealot anywhere.

How do you like your crow? medium rare or cold?
Posted by: NoB$   Posted on: 02/28/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

(NT) Whatever happened to the "Put Up, or Shut Up" order from January?  Plain Logic | 02/27/04
SCO droped the part of the suit...........  nite_w0lf | 02/27/04
An effective way of dragging it out  IT_User | 02/27/04
You have it backward.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/28/04
Very true  NemesisNL | 02/28/04
bitty changes like the wind  NoB$ | 02/28/04
Hmmm... seems to be working  IT_User | 02/28/04
Must Be an Odd Monday...  BanjoPaterson | 03/01/04
"Certainly SCO must have a case"  IT_User | 02/27/04
subject to IBM's right to move against the amended pleadings.  nite_w0lf | 02/27/04
Maybe, and maybe not.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/28/04
An interesting sidenote  nite_w0lf | 02/27/04
Never ending story  OhMyGosh | 02/28/04
I don't agree with this  NoB$ | 02/28/04
IBM's code doesn't belong to SCO  dwjohnso | 02/28/04
in case you didn't know ... link  dwjohnso | 02/28/04
Three lawsuits?  k4_pacific | 02/28/04
As One Groklaw'er writes...  BanjoPaterson | 03/01/04
IBM - Classic Response  Chad_z | 02/29/04
DON'T COUNT SCO  V Sanders | 02/29/04
Baloney  Chad_z | 02/29/04
Of course that's literally true  IT_User | 02/29/04
Perhaps sooner  IT_User | 03/01/04
Must Be an Odd Monday...  BanjoPaterson | 03/01/04
(NT) This was a response to earlier thread...  BanjoPaterson | 03/01/04
testing 123  ScarryJerry | 03/01/04
SCO vs. IBM  rdwhitti | 03/01/04
SCO vs. IBM...rdwhitti  dbradt@... | 03/02/04
SCO  krolsen | 03/05/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

IT Solutions for 2010

  • Get cost-effective strategies and roadmaps on the most important issues facing IT leaders in 2010! Learn how to easily cut costs and deliver greater efficiency starting with your database, IT compliance management and data center. Visit the IT Leaders Dashboard. Visit the IT Leaders Dashboard.
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline