(NT) Whatever happened to the "Put Up, or Shut Up" order from January?
Plain Logic | 02/27/04
|
 
SCO droped the part of the suit...........
nite_w0lf | 02/27/04
|
An effective way of dragging it out
IT_User | 02/27/04
|
|
You have it backward.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/28/04
|
|
Very true
NemesisNL | 02/28/04
|
|
bitty changes like the wind
NoB$ | 02/28/04
|
|
Hmmm... seems to be working
IT_User | 02/28/04
|
|
Must Be an Odd Monday...
BanjoPaterson | 03/01/04
|
|
"Certainly SCO must have a case"
IT_User | 02/27/04
|
|
subject to IBM's right to move against the amended pleadings.
nite_w0lf | 02/27/04
|
|
Maybe, and maybe not.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/28/04
|
|
An interesting sidenote
nite_w0lf | 02/27/04
|
|
Never ending story
OhMyGosh | 02/28/04
|
|
I don't agree with this
NoB$ | 02/28/04
|
|
IBM's code doesn't belong to SCO
dwjohnso | 02/28/04
|
|
in case you didn't know ... link
dwjohnso | 02/28/04
|
|
Three lawsuits?
k4_pacific | 02/28/04
|
|
As One Groklaw'er writes...
BanjoPaterson | 03/01/04
|
|
IBM - Classic Response
Chad_z | 02/29/04
|
|
DON'T COUNT SCO
V Sanders | 02/29/04
|
|
Baloney
Chad_z | 02/29/04
|
|
Of course that's literally true
IT_User | 02/29/04
|
|
Perhaps sooner
IT_User | 03/01/04
|
|
Must Be an Odd Monday...
BanjoPaterson | 03/01/04
|
|
(NT) This was a response to earlier thread...
BanjoPaterson | 03/01/04
|
|
testing 123
ScarryJerry | 03/01/04
|
|
SCO vs. IBM
rdwhitti | 03/01/04
|
|
SCO vs. IBM...rdwhitti
dbradt@... | 03/02/04
|
|
SCO
krolsen | 03/05/04
|
A simplified IT environment isn't just less complex. It's also more reliable. Standardize on a single Linux platform with SUSE Linux Enterprise from Novell, and get the world's most interoperable Linux
Doc delivers the scoop on today's enterprise content management, printer maintenance, and all other issues related to document management. It's the DocuMentor Blog.
