On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 19 of 35:
Next »
« Previous
How about "challenge" instead?
Well, as customers, it's a problem. We have to support both servers and desktops, and at present, we have to have two separate sets of expertise, training, support contractors, etc. This is getting the attention of management, which is becoming aware that there is a desktop alternative. My organization is not alone, we swap visits with many large commercial and government outfits, and the consulting houses regularly visit us (paid or unpaid), and the matter is getting widespread attention.

The numbers seem to show that we could benefit from a migration, but there is no specific impetus to do so. Licenses are paid up, current products still supported; there is not that specific incentive for a "fresh look." But sooner or later, we and our sisters will be forced to prepare for some kind of migration. The possibility of supporting all computer assets, no matter what the usage or who the vendor, with one operating system will certainly be worth looking at.

Call it a problem. Call it a challenge. It is coming.
Posted by: IT_User   Posted on: 02/27/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

More heart-breaking news ....  michael-t | 02/26/04
More heart-breaking news ....  seosamh_z | 02/27/04
More hearbreaking details  michael-t | 02/27/04
More hearbreaking details  seosamh_z | 02/27/04
Application Development  michael-t | 02/28/04
Where is Uncle Remus?  StorageGuru | 02/27/04
yeah right, says who  V Sanders | 02/26/04
I'll save your post  Chad_z | 02/27/04
It's policies like "per-processor lisensing" that drives this.  DanIelWalker_z | 02/27/04
License bites  Chad_z | 02/27/04
Linux server sales show high-end trend  Loverock Davidson | 02/27/04
Don't whine too hard now, lovey dove  Bobby Sskcat | 02/27/04
Thats ironic coming from you  Loverock Davidson | 02/27/04
Huh?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 02/27/04
got a list?  ryusen | 02/27/04
Oblivious to reality  michael-t | 02/27/04
The reality of the future  Xunil_Sierutuf | 02/27/04
Why say Microsoft has problems?  Anton Philidor | 02/27/04
How about "challenge" instead?  IT_User | 02/27/04
Growth Rates  Letophoro | 02/27/04
Next time around  Yagotta B. Kidding | 02/27/04
Yup; at a 63% growth rate Linux catches up eventually.  Anton Philidor | 02/27/04
Maybe!  ShadeTree | 02/27/04
Agreed, there will probably be a slump  IT_User | 02/27/04
You're sounding like the anti-Mike Cox.  Anton Philidor | 02/27/04
Not certain what you are talking about  IT_User | 02/27/04
Not the only "food source"  IT_User | 02/27/04
For the most part the share is coming from Unix shops  ShadeTree | 02/27/04
Absolutely. Longer lead  IT_User | 02/27/04
do the math ..RIGHT!  reedjjjr | 02/27/04
But there is no cost for most Linux License  el1jones | 02/27/04
OEMS ship Enterprise Licenses!  ShadeTree | 02/27/04
What does that do to accuracy of count?  IT_User | 02/27/04
No there isn't!  ShadeTree | 02/27/04
Just as long as Sun comes out on the low end  FilledOut | 02/28/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement