On mySimon: The Biggest Box Sets
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 37 of 44:
Next »
« Previous
They'll never be happy
Gee whiz. Back when the whole ODF in MA debate was going on, the ODF advocates kept saying "MS could've joined OASIS committee that was formulating ODF anytime they wanted to. They were invited in on several occasions, but they said no." Now they get more involved in OASIS (they were involved before ODF came along) and people are already getting conspiracy theories as to their motives. You can't have it both ways.

And besides it sounds like you can quit your worrying. MS didn't join up for the reasons some think they did.
Posted by: Mark Miller   Posted on: 03/27/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

M$ tries to embrace and estinguish  Linux Geek | 03/27/06
Hold on now  OhMyGosh | 03/27/06
Microsoft is not into Nice!  georgep_z | 03/27/06
Everybody Sing...  nucrash | 03/27/06
You are trying to tell me...  Loverock Davidson | 03/27/06
WARNNING! ODF CODE HIJACK IN PROGRESS! OPENDOCS IN PERIL!  Mr. Roboto | 03/27/06
You mean...  dragosani | 03/27/06
Oh come on.  mobrien_12@... | 03/27/06
Fox in the Henhouse  TBBrick | 03/27/06
Its not all roses at Microsoft these days ...  George Mitchell | 03/27/06
If MS is going to be forced to use ODF  Michael Kelly | 03/27/06
Right, MS is preparing for the worst in Europe and elsewhere, not much they  DonnieBoy | 03/27/06
They were a member of the OpenGL board as well...  jinko | 03/27/06
And, as I remember MS has a few OpenGL related patents that everybody was  DonnieBoy | 03/27/06
MS and OpenGL  mobrien_12@... | 03/27/06
Wrong committee  Yagotta B. Kidding | 03/27/06
Really, Microsoft probably can't do much here, this is a sign that they  DonnieBoy | 03/27/06
why the hell ODG accept M$ on the table  toxicfreak | 03/27/06
They have to be neutral and let MS join. Otherwise it is NOT an open  DonnieBoy | 03/27/06
Hey DonnieB  toxicfreak | 03/27/06
Everyone know what MS intentions are, but we don't want to give them any  DonnieBoy | 03/27/06
"We"??? What part of "we" are you?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/27/06
Think he is referring to the IT industry: Can the tiger change its stripes  Plain Logic | 03/27/06
We = those in favor of free and open standards. Those people do NOT want to  DonnieBoy | 03/27/06
CLUE!!!!  Yagotta B. Kidding | 03/27/06
ABM field day  Boot_Agnostic | 03/27/06
Their contribution is/will be security.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/27/06
well NO_ax ODF can live without M$  toxicfreak | 03/27/06
Wanna bet?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/27/06
i dont gamble money  toxicfreak | 03/27/06
What exactly is the bet?  nomorems | 03/27/06
Clueless as usual  Yagotta B. Kidding | 03/27/06
Sure I know how the process works...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/27/06
How the process works  Yagotta B. Kidding | 03/27/06
Interesting  zkiwi | 03/27/06
No royalties, just a license  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/27/06
They'll never be happy  Mark Miller | 03/27/06
ONE MORE FREAKING TIME  Yagotta B. Kidding | 03/27/06
Okay, so I don't know my committees  Mark Miller | 03/28/06
Sooner than later MS will realize that it will indeed have to start  michael_t | 03/27/06
Many in IT doubt MS will EVER change . . .  Plain Logic | 03/27/06
But...  rapson | 03/28/06
for their argument  Boot_Agnostic | 03/28/06
What does Mike's rep have to say about this ??? (nt)  Plain Logic | 03/27/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here