On mySimon: Spiewak Durand Jacket
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 25 of 41:
Next »
« Previous
The SCO Group is also claiming "ownership" of BSD base and Microsoft
The SCO Group have also claimed that users of the BSD based distributions and even Microsoft users themself are using their "Unix" without a license.

http://www.byte.com/documents/s=8276/byt1055784622054/0616_marshall.html"So
"you want royalties from FreeBSD as well?" I asked. Sontag responded that "there may or may not be issues. We believe that UNIX System V provided the basic building blocks for all subsequent computer operating systems, and that they all tend to be derived from UNIX System V (and therefore are claimed as SCO's intellectual property)."

"So is anybody clean? What about Apple and Microsoft?" I wondered. "Sun is clean," he said?but he gave no answer in regards to Apple and Microsoft.

"But I thought that Microsoft had signed a license agreement?" "No," Sontag said. Microsoft merely licensed an "applications interface layer."


The position for BSD users is worse than for Linux users because, unlike the GPL license the BSD license does not grant the actual right to use the patented methord used within the code.


The SCO Group is effectively scamming Linux Users with a variation of the "Data Protection Scam"
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22data+protection+scam%22

Check with your local "Better Business Bureau" if this is in violation of local Fair Trade Acts and Unfair Practices Acts.

1) The SCO Greop has already effectively granted all downstream users of the right to use the Linux kernel under the terms of the Gnu General Public License (GPL).
Since 1994, both Caldera ( which only changed its name to The SCO Group in 2003 ) and the Santa Cruz Operation ( The original SCO which changed its name to Tarentella ) have accepted, profited from and redistributed copyrighted source code from hundreds of developers under the terms of the GPL license.
http://www.fsf.org/licenses/gpl.html
The SCO Group has failed to put forward ANY substantial legal theory why the SCO Group should not be obligated to abide by the terms of the GPL.
http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/sco/sco-without-fear.html
Linux Users already have a license -- the GPL.
The SCO Group is pulling a scam selling unnecessary licenses under terms that directly violate the SCO Group's obligations under the General Public License (GPL).

2) It is a criminal offense to claim, with fraudulent intent, that you have a copyright if you do not. The SCO Group does *NOT* hold the copyrights to the UNIX source code. Novell has *NOT* transfered the title for the works that the SCO Group fraudulently filed for copyright in 2003 when the title has not been transfered. Novell claims it has the right to hold the copyright. The SCO Group do not have the right to sue anybody for violation of copyright works without the assent of the title holder.

3) The SCO Group's claims the right to sue for work in standard UNIX and POSIX interfaces that AT&T and Novell granted full rights to use royalty free in perpetuity for the ISO, ANSI and FIPS federal standards.

4) The SCO Group's contract claims against IBM and others based upon the AT&T license in respect to rights of so called derivative works is in direct contradiction to evidence presented to the SCO Group by Novell.

5) The SCO Group though the press and SEC filings, has bolstered the share price of the SCO Group based upon demonstrably false claims to the contrary of above points 1,2 and 3. The SCO Group CEOs and legal agents were notified by Novell and IBM to the fact *before* the SCO Group made these false claims and presented them as fact. The actions of the SCO Group must be in violation of several US SEC regulations.

The SCO Group is effectively scamming Linux Users with a variation of the "Data Protection Scam"
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22data+protection+scam%22

Check with your local "Better Business Bureau" if this is in violation of local Fair Trade Acts and Unfair practices Acts.
Posted by: David Mohring   Posted on: 02/23/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Whatever!  vdraken | 02/23/04
It is their right to do so  IT Analyst | 02/23/04
True.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/23/04
bitty, the sucker  NoB$ | 02/24/04
Only if.  doe_z | 02/23/04
Data Protection Scam and Other Crimes  David Mohring | 02/23/04
You people get weirder all the time..  NemesisNL | 02/23/04
So what you're saying is...  Chad_z | 02/23/04
But is it  regwells | 02/24/04
A fair exchange  IT_User | 02/24/04
Woooiiiiii, this will be popular.  DonnieBoy | 02/23/04
I cancelled my order for the Brooklyn Bridge!  Xunil_Sierutuf | 02/23/04
Data Protection Scam and Other Crimes  David Mohring | 02/23/04
Keep it short  str_z | 02/24/04
Plus...  DarbyOhara | 02/25/04
I've got some land  wploger | 02/23/04
Why should Linux users pay when they're not guilty!!  HypnoToad | 02/23/04
The False Claims Act  David Mohring | 02/23/04
False headline  Eggs Ackley_z | 02/23/04
free OS  V Sanders | 02/23/04
I'm selling shares in this great bridge in New York . . Buy online now ...  Plain Logic | 02/23/04
If I did something like this...  doh123 | 02/23/04
(NT) Because SCO has MS backing . . . and MS owns the White House and DoJ  Plain Logic | 02/23/04
SCO selling Linux licenses online  Loverock Davidson | 02/23/04
The SCO Group is also claiming "ownership" of BSD base and Microsoft  David Mohring | 02/23/04
Boy oh boy  Loverock Davidson | 02/23/04
BSD plays its part.  doe_z | 02/23/04
Lovesick still shilling  NoB$ | 02/24/04
SCO also has the Brooklin Bridge up for sale!!  xunil skcor | 02/23/04
Tipical media Crap  zuesse | 02/23/04
This is not an endorsement, but...  Michael Kelly | 02/23/04
they will be selling door to door next. (nt)  nite_w0lf | 02/23/04
I will sell you a license too  Sunny Jalolly | 02/23/04
Question is -- who is buying  Uralbas | 02/23/04
what the rest of the world thinks  rgriffith64@... | 02/23/04
SCO No tear shed  beafeater | 02/23/04
SCO Yet to Prove It!!!  regwells | 02/24/04
Meanwhile, back at the ranch...  Zooomy | 02/24/04
This might be worth something in the future...  el1jones | 02/24/04
How many of you are high up in business?  PmAc_z | 02/24/04
Has SCO abandoned the Lawsuit  kgdowling | 02/24/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here