On BNET: Poll: Are You Greedy or a Do-Gooder?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 17 of 45:
Next »
« Previous
Really? I have seen these
First off, I use Unix, Windows, Linux, and proprietary derivative of MUMPS a derivative of PolyForth (which included the source with purchase, not open source) and Novell. Or have used them for long periods of time. I use what is best for the job and am a long time professional and don't need admonished or told I'm another Redmond sheep. Please point to more than one post to this article that is credible, professional and has any merit to the field of IT. Why do you feel the need to say these things to me with posts by the dozens making nothing but anti MS remarks as well as anti MS user remarks such as sheep, suckers, Aholes, what have you. I too have read some of your posts, i really don't have time to chronicle you sir, but I've never read another one like this in response to an obviousl open source, holier than thou zealot that would die if they uttered one good word about Microsoft, and usually post nothing but complete drivel on Microsoft articles. Any articles for that matter. What really blows me away is when there are 10 posts in an article about MAC or something that doesn't even mention MS and they usually have something like MS wrote an exploit to make xyz company look bad and boost their profits even more. If i hear "vaporware" one more time I'm literally going to hurl. So please, as you are so wise with your choices of tools of the trade, please be wise and admonish those posting here in a fair and evenhanded manner, lest your crediblity goes out the window as just another in the army of MS hating, propaganda slinging zealots that pollute the web with garbage. I did come here in hopes of finding something worthwhile but I may just stick to the MS sites which are 100% professional, never anyone posting nasty comments about linus butt boys. It's 100% professional and every forum on the windows wide web are helpful, credible and the forum software and platforms are beautiful and function flawlessly. Something I've noticed is not quite the case with this linux/apache setup here. Nothing against linux, just what I've "experienced". And like you have seen MS machines go south I've had business associates totally burned by open source that went proprietary and left them hanging. To me this is a bit more disconcerting than needing to swap out one client. So pleae feel free to scan the MS articles on this site and point me to ANY posts you can honestly and with integrity say was a worthwhile, honest, well-meaning, professional post and I'd be happy to apologize if I've given the appearance of doing the same. Although I don't think i've ever said quite the things about linux users as I've read with the exception of in direct response. I guess as you felt compelled to instruct me today, i've felt the same need as well. I'm sure you may understand. As for the name being misleading, again, when I see you posting to every name on this site using an inappropriate name, or giving the appearance of being a professional by their name but post nothing but garbage propaganda, I'll be happy to change mine.
thank you sir.
Posted by: xuniL_z   Posted on: 03/07/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Quit dancing  baggins_z | 03/06/06
Or....better yet  xuniL_z | 03/06/06
how original  stormdoor | 03/06/06
What is FUD?  xuniL_z | 03/06/06
Novell Linux Desktop  Richard Flude | 03/06/06
Well, if we can't make LSB work, what he says makes some sense.  DonnieBoy | 03/06/06
Unless I'm very much mistaken...  zkiwi | 03/06/06
Not the same thing.  ShadeTree | 03/07/06
They are compatible  thunderdome1 | 03/07/06
*burp*  zkiwi | 03/06/06
get any on you?  xuniL_z | 03/07/06
Because it works  thunderdome1 | 03/07/06
did that make sense?  xuniL_z | 03/07/06
You're a dumba... i mean, customer  thunderdome1 | 03/07/06
ok, you got me there  xuniL_z | 03/07/06
Really? I have not seen these  Jim Blaine - Bellingham WA. | 03/07/06
Really? I have seen these  xuniL_z | 03/07/06
Vista Upgrades?  Techscan | 03/06/06
Another "nagger" to be prinstalled on PCs  jinko | 03/07/06
Develop for Vista Crippled?  mighetto | 03/06/06
question  xuniL_z | 03/06/06
Risk of Software Development Related to Abramoff  mighetto | 03/06/06
I see what you mean....sort of.  xuniL_z | 03/07/06
Microsoft to make Vista easily upgradeable  Loverock Davidson | 03/06/06
Message has been deleted.  itanalyst | 03/07/06
Look we both know your upset  Loverock Davidson | 03/07/06
Aww..Poor Widdle ZDNet Editors Couldn't Handle The Truth  itanalyst | 03/07/06
They implement what's best for themselves  thunderdome1 | 03/07/06
genius  April May | 03/07/06
Easy upgrades for an OS that doesn't exist  Richard Flude | 03/06/06
Oh, it exists  Qbt | 03/06/06
It's just my guess...  zkiwi | 03/06/06
Good then fill in the missing details  Richard Flude | 03/06/06
re: Good then fill in the missing details  merlin747 | 03/07/06
Liar, Liar, pants on fire.  ShadeTree | 03/07/06
Just because someone has access to the Beta ...  ShadeTree | 03/07/06
Please stop it! you are killing me here ....  michael_t | 03/06/06
I wonder if I can downgrade and be refunded by MS...  merlin747 | 03/07/06
doubtful  April May | 03/08/06
Vista updates?  Mr. Roboto | 03/07/06
BWAHAHAHA!  Chad_z | 03/07/06
A truly inspired idea!  William_Black | 03/07/06
Not that innovative  thunderdome1 | 03/07/06
Dont Do Car Comparisons!!!  itanalyst | 03/07/06
Haha  Protostar | 03/08/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here