Oracle, feds tangle over market definition

TalkBack 2 of 2:

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

This not about Oracle

It is about concerning a direct relationship with a market sustained to itself,and a market wich is manipulated by conduction through a single entity...

Seems as though the intention of the article is to highlight descreprency in rational wich is conducive to mathmatical business formula used for creating effective corrolation to financial asset.

For certain when a person is not an individual to be included some relationship exists making that perspective.

There should not be laws wich create influence on the part of a constency of party,even if that party is only a concept.Especially when a consistency of formula is only theory,while in either relationship 'person remains either affluent to asset,or resource to choose between them.

An example of this is to consists that 'it is a good thing to have 'appreciation''. While only a given set of a group,another set is certainly left out - that is the set concerned with actual housing 'costs,that is the 'man-time wich is consistent with that resource verses the contigency wich gains by producing wealth through something that is actually inflationary.

This has gone on in the past because the 'speaking through the concept has never been confronted since members included included exclusivety to the concept in question - a purely mathmatical formula wich is in and of itself never coincidental in that its a self qualifying in 'real terms.

Actually raising the cost of housing is inflationary. This is as well a real world example. In wich a market is constitent where it involves exclusive individual participation among components that make them up - not an assumption of theory utilizing this mathmatical formula denoting wholes without the relevent proportions.

Then again affluence is influence. Some thing do change. But usually the theory in and of itself involves consolidating mathmatics wich then causes delination within a true market influenced in and of itself.

Laws consisting to 'business practice are well and fine as long as mere mathmatical quanification is and remains separate from the reality wich is and of a market to itself in individual components.

This may not be about oracle at all.A business does not have to rely on a cater of valuation where the formula presents itself - especially since this involves utilizing non-present parties simply on the theory of qualifying the formula.

Its inflationary. Thats all that needs to be justyfied at present. The terms are at ends with the resource and the financial data particpants who deem persons of asset out of ordination among those formulas.

......just talking.

Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 02/22/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Building the Virtualized Enterprise with VMware Iinfrastructure VMware VMware virtualization software has been adopted by over 120,000 enterprise ... Download Now
• Why Isn't Server Virtualization Saving Us More? A Few Small Changes May Dramatically Increase Your Efficiency VMware Companies have rapidly adopted server virtualization over the past few ... Download Now
• Three Steps You Need to Know to Stop Data Loss Varonis Sensitive data exposed to misuse or loss... it is the stuff of nightmares ... Download Now