On TV.com: Watch NARUTO SHIPPUDEN Episode 135
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 34 of 49:
Next »
« Previous
documentation problems
Well you could have a point over there. Documentation is not always in line with userlevel. It is either too advanced or too simple. And the document covering what you exactly want to archieve is pretty rare. But how many doc's would there need to be? You've this problem, another person wants it slightly different; different possibility's are pretty large.

Feedback is important; file a bug report when necessary; email improvements to the maker of an howto if you've encountered problems he/she hasn't described. Or make an howto yourself if none are sufficient.

Look at it this way: you write an howto of about 20 pages and you get back a whole OS with millions lines of code. Copied according to some, created according to others.

Most of the time "shortcuts" to archieve something only results in more frustation at some point in the (near) future (when you want basically the same but just a little different). If people spent time to understand underlying technology (and most people never will, I agree) then those will find out that a lot of things are easier to solve then they ever believed at first sight. Things that are not that easy, they understand why and learn to live with it. But with free software, you never have to wait until somebody else solves the problem for you. Waiting then just is a voluntary option.

I've not looked at thunderbird since version 0.2 (about half a year ago or so); I've decided then that it wasn't really good enough to statisfy my needs. I just saw they were at version 0.5 already, so I do expect it has improved considerably.

For email I'm using evolution myself and I cannot think of some feature I want an email application to have, which is missing.

As far as slowed adaption to opensource due to lack of documention, would you be able to make changes to the microsoft equivalent that easy?

A lot of users switching to free software seem to get the feeling of being in control over their computer again. In some ways that's true, but you cannot have full control over a computer without knowing about it's inner workings. I trashed windows since her '98 nightmare. I do know windows has improved a lot, but I've no need for it anymore.

For most things people want to do with a computer it boils down to, install with a graphical wizard and follow all the menus the application you want to work with provides. I don't know if there's a point in writing books about that. When people start looking "under the hood" it's a different story. But with a proprietary linux counterpart that option just isn't available, so how can it slow adoption? All hours spent in learning how something might work will pay itself back someday, either in money or statisfaction.

I've never really cared if m$ will survive or not, I do care that free software continus to statisfy my computing needs.

Most encountered when (Desktop) users switch are in my opinion:
- lack of hardware support, it has improved, but there still is a lot of crap out there which natively doesn't work with a gnu/linux OS.
- loss of data due to incompatible formats of applications used.
- a specific niche application which a user really needs but hasn't a grown up gnu counterpart yet.

Maybe lack of documentation is for some a reason not to switch over, most people won't take it into consideration I think. How many people buy and read a book about how ms outlook works? When people need docs, they might have problems finding them but if someone knows www.tldp.org and www.google.com then the docs available will be found. I think there's more userdocumentation available for gnu/linux than for windows. But it's just an opinion.

Most people want an OS which just works out of the box, gnu/linux not always does that the way you want it. Windows does, but I don't blame the penguin for it; tux came to me without any guarantees and I do see the additional advantages tux gives me. Except for being Free, stability and flexibility are amongst those.
Posted by: guido_z   Posted on: 02/16/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Wheres the large Linux TCO?  OhMyGosh | 02/16/04
All MS TCO studies are based on US wages.  DonnieBoy | 02/16/04
Sick and tired of open source...  Mike Cox | 02/16/04
Get used to it Baby, the noise willl get so loud you won't be able to sleep  DonnieBoy | 02/16/04
nope, not in the slightest  zijiang | 02/16/04
You might have to define "crash" and "OS" for some of us.  Michael Kelly | 02/16/04
bugged OS  guido_z | 02/16/04
I don't recall  skeptic tank | 02/17/04
Kernel panic  OhMyGosh | 02/16/04
My Linux box crashed just the other day  Chad_z | 02/16/04
I had kernel panics.  doe_z | 02/16/04
a solution offered....  guido_z | 02/16/04
Rep has been engaged...  Mike Cox | 02/16/04
diversion  guido_z | 02/16/04
It's Christmas at Ground Zero...  TrollSlayer | 02/17/04
Wow, Mike, you're not acting like a leader  agramont@... | 02/16/04
Lack of leadership???  Mike Cox | 02/16/04
You call that leadership???  TtfnJohn | 02/16/04
Leadership challenged  guido_z | 02/16/04
you tell em!  ryusen | 02/17/04
Se habla open source?  Loverock Davidson | 02/16/04
Where do you make sense  OhMyGosh | 02/16/04
I think you misunderstood him  Michael Kelly | 02/16/04
I understand him quite well  OhMyGosh | 02/16/04
Definition  Martin Marvinski | 02/16/04
No, I don't think you do  Loverock Davidson | 02/16/04
Were we reading the same article?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 02/17/04
A good example of the problem of a monopoly.  DonnieBoy | 02/16/04
No it won't, but it's a good thing nevertheless  Heatlesssun | 02/16/04
jMS did not do it because there was no competition.  DonnieBoy | 02/16/04
Open source should fix the docs first  Nigel Johnstone | 02/16/04
not so difficult  guido_z | 02/16/04
Expert viewpoint  Nigel Johnstone | 02/16/04
documentation problems  guido_z | 02/16/04
Does not make mistakes??  Robert Carnegie | 02/16/04
Aah, the rub against StarOffice  FilledOut | 02/16/04
Sun does not have to make any money, it is enough to keep MS out  DonnieBoy | 02/16/04
I'm sure Sun's shareholders appreciate that  rapson | 02/16/04
Sun aint losin' nothin' either. And, they can sell servers and other stuff.  DonnieBoy | 02/16/04
Same thing  NoB$ | 02/16/04
money  guido_z | 02/16/04
MS shill tune sounding more like SCO every day.  NoB$ | 02/16/04
excel  guido_z | 02/17/04
Oh, geez  Harvey Birdman | 02/16/04
Open Source means living like 3rd world slums people  Jose.Pinchero | 02/16/04
You bring your standard of living down paying too much for MS crapware.  DonnieBoy | 02/16/04
Message has been deleted.  idnew2005@... | 02/16/04
We know  NoB$ | 02/16/04
ummmm  CobraA1 | 02/16/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here