On TV.com: 5 TV Shows We'd Love on the BIG SCREEN
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 8 of 47:
Next »
« Previous
Why do you think the change was a bad move?
"well that's what red hat calls it"

Nowhere on the project's website does it refer to the fedora
project as experimental or for enthusiasts (see http://
fedora.redhat.com/).

They don't because it isn't! It is a complete Linux
distribution.

"not sure why they did what they did, but it was a bad move
"

I'm in no position to know exactly why they did it, but from
their public comments it appeared they wanted to
concentrate their efforts on their enterprise edition.
Whether this was the correct move I guess we'll have to wait
and see (I don't even know on what basis they plan to
measure the moves success).

However, Fedora is a good distribution. It aggressively
incorporates the latest open source technologies (as
demonstrate by the feature list of Core 2 beta). Whilst we
lost the free Red Hat Network I believe we gained
immensely with the new yum repositories mirrored around
the world. The 1.5 years support by the Fedora Legacy
Project is as good as the RHN (with enormously greater
flexibility).

Why do you think the change was a bad move?
Posted by: Richard Flude   Posted on: 02/14/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Fedora is NOT an "experimental version" nor is it "geared to enthusiasts"  Richard Flude | 02/13/04
The thing I dont get is  Suicida| | 02/13/04
It really does make sense  Richard Flude | 02/14/04
You should use migration tools for that  FirstNLastN | 02/14/04
Many other problems  Richard Flude | 02/14/04
agree with Don Gray  jimk_z | 02/14/04
well that's what red hat calls it  JWatson77 | 02/13/04
Why do you think the change was a bad move?  Richard Flude | 02/14/04
lets put it this way  JWatson77 | 02/14/04
i would NOT install fedora - would you? YES  Richard Flude | 02/14/04
overheads  in-DUH-vidual | 02/14/04
A broken record...  Richard Flude | 02/14/04
Please RTFWP  Knorthern Knight | 02/14/04
You do not need to re-install the OS every few months  Richard Flude | 02/15/04
You do not need to re-install the OS every few months  SC-man | 02/16/04
My views... in reply to all.  doe_z | 02/15/04
distro confusion for the masses  jimk_z | 02/13/04
diversification is a good thing.  Suicida| | 02/13/04
Whats your point?  OhMyGosh | 02/14/04
if i buy windows  JWatson77 | 02/14/04
You must evaluate for yourself the alternatives  Richard Flude | 02/14/04
ok  JWatson77 | 02/14/04
Or Debian or Fedora = 0 payments of $0  Richard Flude | 02/14/04
i agree with you  JWatson77 | 02/15/04
look deeper  in-DUH-vidual | 02/14/04
Looking as deep as it gets....  rock06r | 02/15/04
Disagree on your points.  doe_z | 02/15/04
we all know that one day the OS will be set free  JWatson77 | 02/15/04
you need glasses  in-DUH-vidual | 02/15/04
Think Beyond the MS Mentality  brenthawkinsmd | 02/16/04
10 years  prrawlins | 02/17/04
10 Years?  MG_z | 02/17/04
Not New  rhabkirk@... | 02/14/04
Not too long ago....  rock06r | 02/15/04
Not too long ago....  SC-man | 02/16/04
re  jimk_z | 02/14/04
What is so big about 2.6  Jose.Pinchero | 02/15/04
For starters  Suicida| | 02/16/04
For starters  SC-man | 02/16/04
Fedora a good move on the part of Red Hat  George Mitchell | 02/15/04
nice post again  Suicida| | 02/16/04
The real problem with MS  agramont@... | 02/15/04
Well put.  skeptic tank | 02/16/04
The problem with ABMers.  vdraken | 02/18/04
MMMM - BSD...  toadlife | 02/16/04
a better ability to handle multiple software tasks  Fred Flintsone | 02/16/04
Gee, I thought this was about Linux...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/16/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement