On CHOW: Girls who hate girly drinks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 38 of 101:
Next »
« Previous
That's OK, I've got too. wink
1. The ever popular "Loose" or "Lose".

2. Or the "To", "Two" and "Too" mess, to. wink
Posted by: Cardinal_Bill   Posted on: 02/11/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

What a convoluted mess...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/11/04
I read the transfer documents including the amendments  hipparchus | 02/11/04
All in your point of view I guess.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/11/04
jury  guido_z | 02/11/04
All in your point of view?  jjon2121 | 02/12/04
No Interpretation Here  el1jones | 02/12/04
This is what I mean. To me this is very clear.SCO DOESN'T OWN THE COPYRIGHT  hipparchus | 02/12/04
Why so long...  Fred Fredrickson | 02/11/04
oh???  guido_z | 02/11/04
Would you expect anything else?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/11/04
court system  guido_z | 02/11/04
Not from their point of view.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/11/04
wrong...  guido_z | 02/11/04
Not really...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/11/04
he said she said...  ryusen | 02/11/04
Isn't that what you would expect though?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/11/04
SCO tactics  guido_z | 02/11/04
Never claimed I understand SCO...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/11/04
A gambit that backfired  j.m.galvin | 02/11/04
(NT) The house of cards is beginning to collapse under its own weight.  Plain Logic | 02/11/04
No  Fred Fredrickson | 02/11/04
(NT) Good post.  Plain Logic | 02/11/04
see, you can make sensible posts  ryusen | 02/11/04
Fair enough, but...  Damon K | 02/11/04
Actually, the odcuments in question...  Damon K | 02/11/04
Odcuments?  Damon K | 02/11/04
aThis is why many states require a letter of "intent".  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/11/04
Should be universal  j.m.galvin | 02/11/04
you can't do that!  ryusen | 02/11/04
And how horrible that would be, NOT!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/11/04
Will this be on...  BitTwiddler | 02/12/04
SCO Strategy: Throw enough mud at the wall, some might stick  MarcB_z | 02/11/04
parachuted  guido_z | 02/11/04
They pulling right now.  el1jones | 02/12/04
My Take  MG_z | 02/11/04
moot, not mute  tic swayback | 02/11/04
But...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/11/04
That's OK, I've got too. wink  Cardinal_Bill | 02/11/04
Or "their", "there", "they're"  j.m.galvin | 02/11/04
Gotta love "its" and "it's"  IT_User | 02/11/04
Don't forget your and you're  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/11/04
then there is GHOTI spells fish  Hanover Phist | 02/12/04
Moot vs Mute (I know off the subject)  MG_z | 02/12/04
"Grammer"?  Martin Marvinski | 02/12/04
and mine  dg mh | 02/11/04
Do you really want to know?  dscherf | 02/11/04
It seems so simple...  Fred Fredrickson | 02/11/04
And you left out another biggie  j.m.galvin | 02/11/04
fun  guido_z | 02/11/04
Yes, that one too  Fred Fredrickson | 02/11/04
Not sure if you were joking...  MG_z | 02/12/04
This time next year, McBride and company will be in jail.  DonnieBoy | 02/11/04
Show us your facts.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/11/04
If you could show they profited from the stock and knew they couldn't win.  DonnieBoy | 02/11/04
Are you suggesting they are alone?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/11/04
Yes, there has to be proof beyond a reasonable doubt to put them in jail  DonnieBoy | 02/11/04
Now I understand their choice.....  guido_z | 02/11/04
Oops...  guido_z | 02/11/04
Re :  JWatson77 | 02/12/04
Re :  JWatson77 | 02/12/04
Do you think they knew...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/11/04
they should have  guido_z | 02/12/04
RE: Show us your facts  MG_z | 02/12/04
ummm...  ryusen | 02/11/04
Terrible mess  Bill4 | 02/11/04
The courts should just toss out the suits and counter-suits - all of them.  Plain Logic | 02/11/04
no case  guido_z | 02/11/04
Wed update: Novell drops IBM suit for SCO  rgriffith64@... | 02/11/04
This may be legal on paper  MG_z | 02/12/04
(NT) Could some 'lawyer type' translate the above letter. TIA  Plain Logic | 02/11/04
sco vs novell  guido_z | 02/12/04
additional  guido_z | 02/12/04
A serious question, replies requested.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/11/04
easy  guido_z | 02/12/04
Even easier - Novell aren't in court to answer that question.  Fred Fredrickson | 02/12/04
Not so  dscherf | 02/12/04
the bucks  guido_z | 02/12/04
4.16(b) asset purchase agreement novell/old sco  guido_z | 02/12/04
UNIX Franchise  dscherf | 02/12/04
resellers and existing buisness  rgriffith64@... | 02/12/04
Maybe very little  j.m.galvin | 02/12/04
My answer  MG_z | 02/12/04
Thanks all, but I still question if it will hold water.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/12/04
UNIX(tm) value  rgriffith64@... | 02/12/04
SCO is right, IBM needs to settle  tech3204@... | 02/12/04
without settlement....  guido_z | 02/12/04
SCO is right about what?  rafe01 | 02/12/04
Hey "null"...  MeadMkr | 02/12/04
SCO will win in the end, IBM will pay for the code  tech3204@... | 02/12/04
what code was stolen from who?  guido_z | 02/12/04
Read this then  MG_z | 02/12/04
check this out  jfalknor | 02/12/04
Could there be another McBride motive?  cliffatweber | 02/12/04
Article  MG_z | 02/12/04
Thanks Bill Gates for This SCO Mess!  brenthawkinsmd | 02/12/04
Good grief man, buy yourself a clue!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/12/04
Decision making  guido_z | 02/12/04
IF the SCO suit doesn't have any merit...  ShadeTree | 02/12/04
darl's motive  guido_z | 02/12/04
As the Software Turns  crfroggy_z | 02/12/04
I wonder how much R&D funding could have  starcannon99022@... | 05/05/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement