On BNET: 5 classic computer pranks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 28 of 35:
Next »
« Previous
Linux, Inc.
Reading this article, I saw similarities between Linux as currently managed and a dysfunctional bureaucracy in a single company.

Start here:
SWsoft is trying to get OpenVZ made part of the mainstream Linux kernel--the software at the heart of the operating system--and a part of the major commercial Linux versions, said Kirill Korotaev, a project manager at the Herndon, Va.-based company.

The functionality provided by OpenVZ is in demand and should be available. Though OpenVZ need not be the software providing that functionality.

In order to provide that functionality the kernel must be changed. However, the managers of the kernel have not heard of this product, and have little interest in making the extensive changes necessary.

Products (the kernel) are being developed in ignorance of what the market would be interested in purchasing.
No one is setting strategy and assuring all participants cooperate.

Balked, OpenVZ has to fall back on indirection, making the kernel changes after it leaves the monastery.

Only two companies count for a product hoping for a commercial success, Novell and Red Hat. Think of this as identifying people in an organization powerful enough to be helpful.

Novell isn't interested, having its own (indefinite) plans, but Red Hat is willing to be encouraging. In a way.

Quoting:
In this, it has a major ally: Red Hat, the top seller of the open-source operating system, which plans to add the software to its free Fedora version of Linux for enthusiasts.

Red Hat is willing to allow the program into the free version, and not in the company's real product, RHEL.

So Red Hat has effectively done little more than recognize the product. Why should they bother? Because of the advantages of ingratiationg Red Hat with a more significant parent organization.

Quoting:
But OpenVZ has the advantage over Vserver, said Illuminata analyst Gordon Haff. "OpenVZ is an offshoot of a well-regarded commercial product that's used by quite a few large hosting providers, so it's clearly the more mature," he said. OpenVZ is an open-source underpinning to Virtuozzo, sold by SWsoft, the main backer of the Linux push.
[The quoted comment is not completely logical. Nothing about the connection between OpenVZ and Virtuozzo assures that it's more mature than Vserver.]

It's exaggerating, but Red Hat's tepid acceptance sounds like hiring a powerful executive's nephew.

How likely is it that Novell will implement something or Red Hat will move the product into RHEL quickly?

And just to add complications, still another group is promoting software providing related functionality (Xen), which can probably be adapted easily to provide what OpenVZ provides.

That makes three possibilities, and no one making the kernel changes necessary to use them well.

It's the extensive kernel changes that makes this story one of infighting in a company rather than competing applications.


The worst infighting occurs when people believe that they have to cheat in order to win a competition of ideas and produce a beneficial result. Sort of like Linux, Inc.

Quoting:
In the past, although source code was available to those who requested it, as required by the GPL, SWsoft was reluctant to share, Korotaev said.

"There were some ideas about competitors, such as Vserver. We didn't want them to access our code easily," Korotaev said. "Sure, they could get (source code) if they bought Virtuozzo. But when our technology was only started, it was important that our ideas wouldn't appear in another project."

The approach meant SWsoft staff "basically were violating the GPL by not providing the source to their kernel modifications to their customers," said Vserver project leader Herbert Poetzl.


Sounds like this will turn into another "We're more open source than you are" arguments like the one between Sun and Red Hat.


Fractious doesn't begin to cover the situation.
Posted by: Anton Philidor   Posted on: 01/17/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

How do you do this in Windows Vista?  spinits | 01/17/06
This is really not desktop technology, but, you could use it to isolate  DonnieBoy | 01/17/06
Problem is...  pierrejvr | 01/17/06
Well...  just^me | 01/17/06
How is Xen a waste of effort?  balsover | 01/17/06
What are you talking about...  just^me | 01/17/06
VT makes it transparent to OS  george_ou | 01/17/06
Vista is for a desktop, you want to use Windows Server.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
I stand corrected  spinits | 01/17/06
Don't berlieve so  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
Well, as far as I know  thetargos | 01/17/06
No, you are incorrect  balsover | 01/17/06
That's one opinion, the majority don't agree.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
And these opinions count  nomorems | 01/17/06
partitioning and virtualization are not server centric.  B.O.F.H. | 01/17/06
Then step up.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/17/06
Yeah, MS prefers to let others do the grunt work  nomorems | 01/17/06
Companies push Linux partitioning effort  Loverock Davidson | 01/17/06
Ketchup? One of the main ingredient of MS Windows:  Judas I. | 01/17/06
Not on my machine  balsover | 01/17/06
Really? Seems like just last month some XP users ...  Judas I. | 01/17/06
Updating  Loverock Davidson | 01/17/06
Hmm, try modifying some public or private store data ...  Judas I. | 01/17/06
And what would you call Microsoft's efforts?  balsover | 01/17/06
Innovative, superb, outstanding... the list goes on  Loverock Davidson | 01/17/06
and it wasn't about Linux either, but you mentioned it  balsover | 01/18/06
So what?  Anti_Zealot | 01/17/06
Linux, Inc.  Anton Philidor | 01/17/06
RHEL Cycle  SGT_Spam | 01/17/06
Please reread my post.  Anton Philidor | 01/17/06
There is no way this will go into the Linux kernel, IT DOESNT BELONG THERE!  xunil skcor | 01/17/06
probably have a buildable option for support  ~doolittle~ | 01/17/06
WRONG !!! - Linux's main uptake is in the corporate data center ...  Plain Logic | 01/17/06
buzzword compliant, but is it useful?  markhahn | 01/17/06
drop $3k on a nice server,  mrlinux | 01/18/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc