Which "Open" or "Standards based"?
Nigel Johnstone | 01/04/06
|

More patronisingly put with pictures here:
Nigel Johnstone | 01/04/06
|

So all the thousands of governments using PDF...
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/04/06
|

OK, no contract.
Still Lynn | 01/06/06
|
Need I say more
zzz1234567890 | 01/04/06
|

Need I write more :"Massachusetts sticking with 'open' documents " - NT
nomorems | 01/04/06
|

Please say more
tic swayback | 01/04/06
|
 
tic, you are being naive.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/04/06
|
  
Right, like when they tell you that you COULD get a tax rebate.
DonnieBoy | 01/04/06
|
  
Good point, No_Ax. . . . Politicians are spineless - and will bow to money.
Plain Logic | 01/04/06
|
 
I will avert my attention...
Anton Philidor | 01/05/06
|
  
Doesn't hurt that much
tic swayback | 01/05/06
|
I really doubt they will implement odf by Jan 2007
DonnieBoy | 01/04/06
|
Yes, use an open standard. XML
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/04/06
|

Yes, odf is an open XML format. Microsofts is not, no rant, just facts
DonnieBoy | 01/04/06
|
 
Won't make a bit of difference.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/05/06
|
Microsoft's XML is not open and thats the end of the story
whisperycat | 01/05/06
|

The end for you maybe, not Mass.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/05/06
|
Priorities
duane.wills@... | 01/05/06
|
Why does microsoft waste time on such piffle
hipparchus2001 | 01/05/06
|

Sony is better than MSFT? I want what you're smokin'
flatliner | 01/05/06
|
 
ps2 games are better
hipparchus2001 | 01/05/06
|