On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 215:
Next »
« Previous
what?????
where do you get this stuff? I mean honestly.. you propegate half truths and innuendo as gospel... you sound liek someone who's worried about their job..
Posted by: ickusslime@...   Posted on: 02/06/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

one question  ryusen | 02/06/04
half an answer  Still Lynn | 02/07/04
SCO will win in the end  Christian_<>< | 02/06/04
what?????  ickusslime@... | 02/06/04
His position at IBM got outsourced (NT)  MarcB_z | 02/06/04
How do you get outsourced FROM IBM  IT_User | 02/06/04
Wrong company  NoB$ | 02/08/04
You could be right....  tiger9999 | 02/09/04
My bet  Jose Jimenez | 02/06/04
Who hacked?  samp_z | 02/07/04
who hacked  guido_z | 02/08/04
Souther_Pride Is Just Another...  The Real Bitch | 02/08/04
have you ever considered doing this for a living? (nt)  ryusen | 02/06/04
you mean he doesn't?  blahblahblah | 02/07/04
Mr. Scarecrow, I presume  NoB$ | 02/06/04
??  bilbobaggins_z | 02/06/04
SCO will win in the end  michael-t | 02/06/04
horrible treatment...  guido_z | 02/06/04
SCO will win in "the end""  Jay Cash | 02/07/04
This is an SCO shill  wolf_z | 02/07/04
Martin!!!  Martin Marvinski | 02/08/04
That is a disgraceful allegation  tiger9999 | 02/09/04
Grow up  drichards1953 | 02/09/04
an expert in our midst!  Iko_z | 02/09/04
And the dwinner gets:  Update victim | 02/09/04
I think not  balsover | 02/09/04
This statement is based on what fact?  JimSatterfieldW | 02/10/04
They told them to be mean to us!!!  r0ckflite | 02/06/04
It gets more interesting.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
Interesting in a "dumb and dumber" way  Xunil_Sierutuf | 02/06/04
Well, actually, it is a bit interesting  IT_User | 02/06/04
Certainly, in that respect. IBM will have Darl on a spit by the time...  dicktaurus@... | 02/07/04
Please explain  MarcB_z | 02/06/04
I have no idea yet who is right.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
What about Microsoft???  Bobby Sskcat | 02/06/04
Don't know, don't care.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
None of which made any difference.  xode@... | 02/09/04
Microsoft is above the law  MacGeek2121 | 02/12/04
risk management  guido_z | 02/06/04
Message has been deleted.  dicktaurus@... | 02/07/04
You may have a point  John L. Ries | 02/09/04
there's no assumptions being made here...  ryusen | 02/06/04
But one thing still puzzles me  IT_User | 02/06/04
he isn't?  ryusen | 02/06/04
Don't know  IT_User | 02/06/04
Darl's Candy  guido_z | 02/06/04
I suspect a certain RICO-bait company in Redmond has him well-padded.  dicktaurus@... | 02/07/04
Something to consider...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
Not true if considering copyright infringement  dscherf | 02/06/04
Maybe,,,  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
I can tell you why...  Damon K | 02/06/04
Not so...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/07/04
What is actually being said in the courts  B.O.F.H. | 02/07/04
re, nag: not just the distros  ryusen | 02/09/04
Not at all Don  dscherf | 02/08/04
Trust the fraudulent courts in this country...  xode@... | 02/09/04
Would you risk summary judgement?  IT_User | 02/06/04
That's certainly one point of view.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
And it would be interesting to hear them  IT_User | 02/06/04
Something to consider...  NoB$ | 02/06/04
NWOR  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
civilisation  guido_z | 02/06/04
Don't fret. NAG demonstrates daily he's as uncivilized as M$ employees...  dicktaurus@... | 02/07/04
You hit the nail on the head there bucko...  quietLee | 02/09/04
I am so sad about this  NoB$ | 02/07/04
(NT) NoB$, good points. . . SCO is as 'scummy' as MS has proven out to be.  Plain Logic | 02/06/04
i've considered that...  ryusen | 02/06/04
True, SCO is using two *courts*  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
hey didnt' hear a horn tooting  ryusen | 02/06/04
Hoist with your own petard  Fred Fredrickson | 02/07/04
politics and money  guido_z | 02/07/04
American Justice System  NoB$ | 02/07/04
Playing poker with a tarot deck  Still Lynn | 02/08/04
Something more to consider Don  bgoss@... | 02/09/04
Shows no proof???  Fred Flintsone | 02/06/04
nope  guido_z | 02/07/04
Stone age legal tactics  Still Lynn | 02/08/04
The Law  JimSatterfieldW | 02/10/04
Not really, no.  Zogg | 02/06/04
Well, that's certainly an "outsiders" opinion.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
We don't live in a vacuum!  Zogg | 02/06/04
Sorry, I see many sides.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
"see" vs. "speak" (nt)  ryusen | 02/06/04
That's why there's this thing called "evidence".  Zogg | 02/06/04
What point of view?  NoB$ | 02/08/04
Well, that's certainly an "outsiders" opinion.  NoB$ | 02/06/04
Message has been deleted.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/07/04
Like herding cats, only tougher.  NoB$ | 02/07/04
Better, keep trying.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/08/04
This is it?  NoB$ | 02/08/04
As a paid $hill & employee of M$, YOU'REno outsider to SCO, that's true!  dicktaurus@... | 02/07/04
Defining boundaries  Still Lynn | 02/08/04
Betting the company  tic swayback | 02/06/04
Just an expression tic...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
Taking care with language  tic swayback | 02/06/04
Thank you oh so much!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
leading language  ryusen | 02/06/04
Hmmm, most seem to understand.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
re:  ryusen | 02/06/04
Let me help ZZ  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/07/04
why thank you  ryusen | 02/09/04
you made it past the 4th grade?  blahblahblah | 02/07/04
As Captain Manwaring would Say to Frank Pike, viz:  BanjoPaterson | 02/07/04
Just trying to keep you honest  tic swayback | 02/08/04
Don't blame Bit, blame BillG  Robert Crocker | 02/06/04
are you sure you want to go down that road?  blahblahblah | 02/07/04
Bob's right. You're not. Get over it.  dicktaurus@... | 02/07/04
dear "taurus"  blahblahblah | 02/07/04
X amount of $ compared to what?  Still Lynn | 02/08/04
Your take on the jury mindset is what's interesting  Jose Jimenez | 02/06/04
But trying to get to the jury  IT_User | 02/06/04
Yes, I know, and that is what surprises me.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
IBM's legal tactics surprise you?  Still Lynn | 02/08/04
Whole new lawsuit  Mark Gist | 02/06/04
I don't believe that is true.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
From the article  NemesisNL | 02/06/04
Maybe you should read the court transcripts!  B.O.F.H. | 02/07/04
Belief preferred over documentation?  Still Lynn | 02/08/04
Is this the best you can do, NAG?  NoB$ | 02/06/04
What to do with your posts.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
utter immaturity  blahblahblah | 02/07/04
Learn how to...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/07/04
that's not the reality  blahblahblah | 02/07/04
Tell you what...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/08/04
And it isn't foolish to assume SCO has something to backup their claims?  Richard Flude | 02/06/04
And there is the problem...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
Firstly I don't know who's right, but...  Richard Flude | 02/06/04
Overly defensive?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/07/04
wow...  guido_z | 02/07/04
forget defensive, working on my offense!  Richard Flude | 02/07/04
No, that is *SCO's problem*.  Zogg | 02/06/04
wrong again  NemesisNL | 02/06/04
uh huh right -- evidence  blahblahblah | 02/07/04
Until SCO Present Evidence, No_Axon_to_Find, SCO has NO CASE  BanjoPaterson | 02/07/04
The problem is you are FUD-pucking for M$_AND_SCO both. Why?  dicktaurus@... | 02/07/04
You have to decide wich way you want it...  NemesisNL | 02/06/04
Oh, it does indeed get more interesting  FamilyManFirst | 02/06/04
Re: Re: It gets more interesting  Solid Water | 02/06/04
I think you have a typo  Robert Crocker | 02/06/04
ANTI-FUD www.groklaw.new  BanjoPaterson | 02/07/04
Er, Bitty's M$ masters don't let him go to GROK. He might get real...  dicktaurus@... | 02/07/04
scary  guido_z | 02/07/04
The Code that is claimed by SCO  wrench_ninja | 02/07/04
Assumption?  Martin Marvinski | 02/08/04
In this case, IBM needs to prevail...  xode@... | 02/09/04
What jury!  MG_z | 02/09/04
re: What jury!  bgoss@... | 02/09/04
This gets settled out of court I bet.  Heatlesssun | 02/06/04
No settlement (IMO)  dscherf | 02/06/04
That is SCO's plan  MarcB_z | 02/06/04
Original plan was a buyout  IT_User | 02/06/04
Your suggestion SCO has anything is not just wrong, but dumb. Why?  dicktaurus@... | 02/07/04
Why not go for a cool trillion?  avilensk1966@... | 02/06/04
They have one simple request  jfrankcarr | 02/06/04
SCO claims  hmgbird | 02/09/04
finally, some clarifications!  dg mh | 02/06/04
After 9 months they are starting to make sense, but .....  Still Lynn | 02/06/04
Clarifications?  NemesisNL | 02/06/04
derivative work makes sense!  dg mh | 02/07/04
Now you're babbling. Makes less sense in c-right that in Biz secret context  dicktaurus@... | 02/07/04
LOL, makes no more sense - actually less - than the other crap, Micro$hill!  dicktaurus@... | 02/07/04
Wow, all that money and no code shown  Xunil_Sierutuf | 02/06/04
WTF????  RedHat9User | 02/06/04
lol -- huh?  blahblahblah | 02/07/04
you got it!! right on!! wink  princessangry | 02/09/04
Thanks to Microsoft's Backing for SCO's False Accusations  brenthawkinsmd | 02/06/04
well...  doh123 | 02/06/04
You must mean companies like Sun, HP, SGI, etc...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
not sure what you mean  JWatson77 | 02/07/04
no need to second guess what he "said"  blahblahblah | 02/07/04
Of course there is UNIX code in Windows.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/07/04
I guess that explains  michael-t | 02/07/04
Good point Bitster!  Still Lynn | 02/08/04
What about the lawyers?  IT_User | 02/08/04
The lawyers get to keep the money they were paid  Still Lynn | 02/09/04
Microsoft does have Unix code in WIndows  B.O.F.H. | 02/07/04
Not so sure about that....  tiger9999 | 02/09/04
Unix code is Unix code no matter...  Still Lynn | 02/09/04
SCO VP has hinted at this  Still Lynn | 02/08/04
No code?  gordon@... | 02/06/04
no code- nope  bilbobaggins_z | 02/06/04
Must be the crack speaking  fullebr@... | 02/06/04
Hollywod glamor  michael-t | 02/06/04
Yes, but (the old) SCO released all that code under the GPL  George Jay | 02/06/04
Somebody put SCO away please!!  nograin | 02/06/04
Inside SCO's Lawyer's Office ...  dr praetorius | 02/06/04
I hope their lawyers asking for payments up front  JWatson77 | 02/07/04
In fact they are  IT_User | 02/07/04
Already did, Peg!  Still Lynn | 02/08/04
Mewawaw  MG_z | 02/09/04
IBM's "Linux License" from SCO???  heron | 02/06/04
This is interesting...  doe_z | 02/06/04
SCO purchased from Novell??  csk_1975 | 02/06/04
Interesting reading  copygod74 | 02/06/04
Usually  Letophoro | 02/06/04
No, not usually  Chad_z | 02/06/04
bitterness  guido_z | 02/07/04
sco ought to have some proof before accusing IBM of getting Novell .....  hipparchus | 02/06/04
Since when?  MG_z | 02/09/04
McBride reminds me of Bush  Chad_z | 02/06/04
Oh Chad! You're so witty...  billywill | 02/06/04
So where is this leaving/leading Red Hat?  bascule | 02/07/04
re : SCO claim reaches $5 billion  JWatson77 | 02/07/04
It's OK.  Yen_z | 02/07/04
Don't Tweak the Nose of the Gorilla  BarbieLee | 02/09/04
This comment is pretty scary ...  George Jay | 02/09/04
test  cjules13 | 08/10/04
Who's Really Behind This?  netevangelist | 02/09/04
Interesting Development  MarcB_z | 02/09/04
They're fighting a losing battle  CobraA1 | 02/09/04
New [lack of] developments...  Still Lynn | 02/09/04
All Part of the Master Plan  wbs00001 | 02/09/04
US Security in jepordy!  msdead | 02/09/04
IBM is going to eat SCO for lunch  jstead1 | 02/09/04
National Security?  opensource@... | 02/09/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here