On TV.com: CSI: Miami's OMAR M. Wants a Light Saber
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 44 of 142:
Next »
« Previous
OSR, I am going to have to stop reading your posts, man!
You have got to be kidding! Please tell me you are trolling!

Have you ever written one line of code in your life? What open, GPL/LGPL/BSD/MPL code do I need to write HTML2.0/3.0/3.2/4.0/DHTML/XHTML/XML or any other standard? Can I not continue to surf the web with IE4.0 or Netscape 2.0? Of course I can because there exists standards that allow me to do so.

Furthermore, Any document written on the web way back in 1994 in the ratified standards that existed then can now be read quite well with Firefox1.0.7 and will be quite readable in Fx2.0 when it arrives. That is what Mass. wants. They want that 50 years from now, any archived document can be read by someone and that the format will not be one that requires a license that is no longer being sold (hence the terms, deadware and abandonware).

The fact is that if I want to create a document that adheres to the ODF ratified standard, I can use any code to create it including freely available GPL/LGPL/BSD code --why re-invent the wheel-- or my own proprietary code written in ANSI C using a public domain ANSI-C compiler or my own proprietary code written using proprietary Borland C++ Compiler or MS Visual Studio or Delphi or....

There is no requirement to use any GPL/public domain/MPL/BSD software whatsoever to read/write to the ODF but since LGPL code exists, is tha tnot easier? I know that I woulnd't re-write the code unless I found a way to do it more efficiently or I am using some really weird platform where I have to re-write the code. Like maybe I wnat my Atari 2600 to produce an ODF speadsheet.

I believe that a lot more than your OS needs reinstalling.
Posted by: The King's Servant   Posted on: 11/29/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

The right decision.  Anton Philidor | 11/28/05
The right decision?  htotten | 11/28/05
Don't you want Microsoft to improve the product?  Anton Philidor | 11/28/05
Improving Standards  zztong | 11/28/05
Does a standard communicate information...  Anton Philidor | 11/28/05
Network effect  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Improvement (?)  htotten | 11/28/05
The problem is NOT improvment. it is Proprietariness  Update victim | 11/28/05
The problem is NOT improvment.  Update victim | 11/28/05
Re: Don't you want Microsoft to improve the product?  JDThompson | 11/29/05
Microsoft has no choice but to fight ODF  Quiet_Type | 11/29/05
Hang on, you seem to have your wires crossed.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
Cost....  htotten | 11/28/05
Yes the GPL has a cost.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
Aren't you smarter than this No_Ax?  Steve Z | 11/28/05
I was waiting for someone to point that out  Edward Meyers | 11/28/05
Boy, I can't wait to see No_Ax's reply to this...  beerman_z | 11/28/05
You're smarter than this No_Ax  Steve Z | 11/28/05
You're smarter than this No_Ax  Steve Z | 11/28/05
read the GPL  Scott W | 11/29/05
GPL misconceptions  JDThompson | 11/29/05
Re: Yes the GPL has a cost.  none none | 11/29/05
Not quite done done  osreinstall | 11/29/05
Re: Hang on, you seem to have your wires crossed.  none none | 11/29/05
Oh dear  Anti_Zealot | 11/30/05
But it never would have happened if not for ...  Judas I. | 11/28/05
Microsoft doesn't want its products used widely?  Anton Philidor | 11/28/05
Sure, they want their products "used widely," ...  Judas I. | 11/28/05
How did the MA officials know...  Anton Philidor | 11/28/05
Go back to Social Studies 101, Anton.  Judas I. | 11/28/05
Sorry but your wrong...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
For me, a return visit.  Anton Philidor | 11/28/05
You are gathering allies without their permission OB.  osreinstall | 11/28/05
osreinstall: check facts  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Yagotta I know you didn't check facts.  osreinstall | 11/28/05
osreinstall: volley  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
osreinstall: volley  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Right back at you Yagotta  osreinstall | 11/28/05
osreinstall: data  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Return volley Yagotta  osreinstall | 11/28/05
osreinstall: proof by forcible repetition  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
osreinstall: Here's how to get me on your side...  Michael Kelly | 11/28/05
2 volleys  osreinstall | 11/28/05
OSR, I am going to have to stop reading your posts, man!  The King's Servant | 11/29/05
That is up to you servant.  osreinstall | 11/29/05
Gimme a break  mosborne | 11/29/05
RE: ...Up to you, Servant.  The King's Servant | 11/29/05
Nice try  osreinstall | 11/29/05
Gimme a break  mosborne | 11/29/05
Gimme a break  mosborne | 11/29/05
Nope Mosborne, you cannot have open source at all costs.  osreinstall | 11/29/05
This was an open process...  Physco Dude | 11/29/05
Partisanship  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Yeah, but, remember, I said ...  Judas I. | 11/28/05
Why did MS decide to change the license terms originally?  Steve Z | 11/28/05
Because developers wanted the change.  Anton Philidor | 11/29/05
You seem to be confused on timing. XML has been part  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
Timing...  htotten | 11/28/05
Not quite true...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
True but unimportant  Michael Kelly | 11/28/05
I don't know about that....  el1jones | 11/28/05
If ms's Open XML any different than PDF?  JoeMama_z | 11/28/05
I don't consider PDF as an open standard either...  el1jones | 11/28/05
I wasn't really suggesting you....  JoeMama_z | 11/28/05
heh....  JoeMama_z | 11/28/05
It is ZDnet's reliance on ...  ShadeTree | 11/28/05
Okay, I'm impressed... but...  el1jones | 11/28/05
couldn't tell ya......  JoeMama_z | 11/28/05
Hmmm, I've used them all, what do you think is missing?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
Really?  Rick_K | 11/28/05
additionally,...  The King's Servant | 11/29/05
Free Reader...  htotten | 11/28/05
Update? hmmm, how many Adobe Reader updates  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
PDF is open  JDThompson | 11/29/05
So wrong I can't even count them all.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
ODF Not GPLed  Edward Meyers | 11/28/05
Invitation  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Neither does MA  jjanks | 11/29/05
Put foot in mouth, and speak...  Physco Dude | 11/28/05
What on earth are you talking about?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
you were of the opinion MSXML was suitable before the licence changes  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
Ummm, what have they been using all these years?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
You mean  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
I have been using OOo since 1.x  The King's Servant | 11/29/05
Oh and as to the IT wage earners...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
employ a professional get an honest answer. "Yes" men are cheaper  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
If you had followed the saga...  Physco Dude | 11/30/05
Not yet  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
can other tools author the MSXML now?  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
can other tools author the MSXML now?  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
YOu bet they can, all they need do is accept the GPL license...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
which one (they are all different)  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
There is no value in using MSXML anyway  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
Not fair reporting  TomM_z | 11/28/05
Good point (nt)  el1jones | 11/28/05
High profile ODF users?  Quiet_Type | 11/29/05
Extend and extinguish  tero_t_vaananen@... | 11/28/05
WRONG!  vdraken | 11/28/05
How many  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
embrace, extend, extinguish  JDThompson | 11/29/05
Patent encumbered?  Nigel Johnstone | 11/28/05
True, open source (Linux) is gathering and using patents.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
I congradulate both sides  Michael Kelly | 11/28/05
me too, but technically MSXML is lousy  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
Hmmm, how does ODF handle rights management?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
Of course if MS had given their input when given the chance  Michael Kelly | 11/28/05
Don must be happy indeed  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Don must be happy indeed  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Don must be happy indeed  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Don must be happy indeed  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
OASIS Has Different Specs For Rights Management  Edward Meyers | 11/28/05
file formats can't manage copyright  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
file formats can't manage copyright  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
And a red herring...  John Le'Brecage | 11/28/05
How does MSO XML handle rights management?  Physco Dude | 11/29/05
Formats don't handle rights, programs do.  mosborne | 11/29/05
What I find interesting is ...  George Jay | 11/28/05
Huh? What is unproven?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
Unproven  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
YBK, Office has had XML for years.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
Office 2003 Is Not Office 12/OPEN XML  Edward Meyers | 11/28/05
And the beat goes on...  Physco Dude | 11/28/05
Penalties for non-compliance needed  Sxooter_z | 11/28/05
Only if it works both ways...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
Orwell  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Maybe you should read what I wrote again.  Sxooter_z | 11/29/05
Validation  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
GReat idea, Especially the reversion to Public Domain. -NT  Update victim | 11/29/05
Alas, it only works the other way.  blu_z | 12/01/05
I.E, Microsoft Came In And Threatened Mass.  itanalyst | 11/28/05
So, do I say "I Told You So" yet??/  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
Of course you do  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
just as well microsoft didnt resort to dirty tricks  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
Improving customer goodwill  Michael Kelly | 11/28/05
Small world  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Small world  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
No, you get to eat crow.  John Le'Brecage | 11/28/05
right when I'm gone totally cold about it:- it's junk  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
Schemas # Format  mosborne | 11/28/05
Interesting...  John Le'Brecage | 11/28/05
Sure  mosborne | 11/30/05
Why IP owners should fret  vampares | 11/28/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement