On CHOW: Girls who hate girly drinks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 28 of 142:
Next »
« Previous
Sure, they want their products "used widely," ...
... as long as their "product" (document format) can ONLY be used on an OS, via an application, which puts money in THEIR pockets.

Otherwise, like a spoiled child, they threaten to pick up all their marbles and go home. Whenever the law sees problems with the way MS plays, and insists that they change their products to play more nicely, MS always claims such changes would "'cripple' Windows to the point that the company may pull the OS from the market."

See:
http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,106569,00.asp

The only "special interest" the MA officials were looking at was THE PEOPLE, the very "special interest" they are supposed to serve in the first place. What did they have to gain, or any of the FREE software proponents have to gain, by insisting that government documents should be able to be read, and created, by everyone; free of the onerous price of admission (EULA) charged by Microsoft?

Oh, that's right, according to YOU, Anton, anything that DOESN'T line the pockets of the rich is obviously villainous and criminal, eh? You noble Republicon, you! silly
Posted by: Judas I.   Posted on: 11/28/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

The right decision.  Anton Philidor | 11/28/05
The right decision?  htotten | 11/28/05
Don't you want Microsoft to improve the product?  Anton Philidor | 11/28/05
Improving Standards  zztong | 11/28/05
Does a standard communicate information...  Anton Philidor | 11/28/05
Network effect  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Improvement (?)  htotten | 11/28/05
The problem is NOT improvment. it is Proprietariness  Update victim | 11/28/05
The problem is NOT improvment.  Update victim | 11/28/05
Re: Don't you want Microsoft to improve the product?  JDThompson | 11/29/05
Microsoft has no choice but to fight ODF  Quiet_Type | 11/29/05
Hang on, you seem to have your wires crossed.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
Cost....  htotten | 11/28/05
Yes the GPL has a cost.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
Aren't you smarter than this No_Ax?  Steve Z | 11/28/05
I was waiting for someone to point that out  Edward Meyers | 11/28/05
Boy, I can't wait to see No_Ax's reply to this...  beerman_z | 11/28/05
You're smarter than this No_Ax  Steve Z | 11/28/05
You're smarter than this No_Ax  Steve Z | 11/28/05
read the GPL  Scott W | 11/29/05
GPL misconceptions  JDThompson | 11/29/05
Re: Yes the GPL has a cost.  none none | 11/29/05
Not quite done done  osreinstall | 11/29/05
Re: Hang on, you seem to have your wires crossed.  none none | 11/29/05
Oh dear  Anti_Zealot | 11/30/05
But it never would have happened if not for ...  Judas I. | 11/28/05
Microsoft doesn't want its products used widely?  Anton Philidor | 11/28/05
Sure, they want their products "used widely," ...  Judas I. | 11/28/05
How did the MA officials know...  Anton Philidor | 11/28/05
Go back to Social Studies 101, Anton.  Judas I. | 11/28/05
Sorry but your wrong...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
For me, a return visit.  Anton Philidor | 11/28/05
You are gathering allies without their permission OB.  osreinstall | 11/28/05
osreinstall: check facts  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Yagotta I know you didn't check facts.  osreinstall | 11/28/05
osreinstall: volley  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
osreinstall: volley  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Right back at you Yagotta  osreinstall | 11/28/05
osreinstall: data  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Return volley Yagotta  osreinstall | 11/28/05
osreinstall: proof by forcible repetition  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
osreinstall: Here's how to get me on your side...  Michael Kelly | 11/28/05
2 volleys  osreinstall | 11/28/05
OSR, I am going to have to stop reading your posts, man!  The King's Servant | 11/29/05
That is up to you servant.  osreinstall | 11/29/05
Gimme a break  mosborne | 11/29/05
RE: ...Up to you, Servant.  The King's Servant | 11/29/05
Nice try  osreinstall | 11/29/05
Gimme a break  mosborne | 11/29/05
Gimme a break  mosborne | 11/29/05
Nope Mosborne, you cannot have open source at all costs.  osreinstall | 11/29/05
This was an open process...  Physco Dude | 11/29/05
Partisanship  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Yeah, but, remember, I said ...  Judas I. | 11/28/05
Why did MS decide to change the license terms originally?  Steve Z | 11/28/05
Because developers wanted the change.  Anton Philidor | 11/29/05
You seem to be confused on timing. XML has been part  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
Timing...  htotten | 11/28/05
Not quite true...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
True but unimportant  Michael Kelly | 11/28/05
I don't know about that....  el1jones | 11/28/05
If ms's Open XML any different than PDF?  JoeMama_z | 11/28/05
I don't consider PDF as an open standard either...  el1jones | 11/28/05
I wasn't really suggesting you....  JoeMama_z | 11/28/05
heh....  JoeMama_z | 11/28/05
It is ZDnet's reliance on ...  ShadeTree | 11/28/05
Okay, I'm impressed... but...  el1jones | 11/28/05
couldn't tell ya......  JoeMama_z | 11/28/05
Hmmm, I've used them all, what do you think is missing?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
Really?  Rick_K | 11/28/05
additionally,...  The King's Servant | 11/29/05
Free Reader...  htotten | 11/28/05
Update? hmmm, how many Adobe Reader updates  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
PDF is open  JDThompson | 11/29/05
So wrong I can't even count them all.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
ODF Not GPLed  Edward Meyers | 11/28/05
Invitation  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Neither does MA  jjanks | 11/29/05
Put foot in mouth, and speak...  Physco Dude | 11/28/05
What on earth are you talking about?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
you were of the opinion MSXML was suitable before the licence changes  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
Ummm, what have they been using all these years?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
You mean  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
I have been using OOo since 1.x  The King's Servant | 11/29/05
Oh and as to the IT wage earners...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
employ a professional get an honest answer. "Yes" men are cheaper  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
If you had followed the saga...  Physco Dude | 11/30/05
Not yet  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
can other tools author the MSXML now?  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
can other tools author the MSXML now?  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
YOu bet they can, all they need do is accept the GPL license...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
which one (they are all different)  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
There is no value in using MSXML anyway  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
Not fair reporting  TomM_z | 11/28/05
Good point (nt)  el1jones | 11/28/05
High profile ODF users?  Quiet_Type | 11/29/05
Extend and extinguish  tero_t_vaananen@... | 11/28/05
WRONG!  vdraken | 11/28/05
How many  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
embrace, extend, extinguish  JDThompson | 11/29/05
Patent encumbered?  Nigel Johnstone | 11/28/05
True, open source (Linux) is gathering and using patents.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
I congradulate both sides  Michael Kelly | 11/28/05
me too, but technically MSXML is lousy  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
Hmmm, how does ODF handle rights management?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
Of course if MS had given their input when given the chance  Michael Kelly | 11/28/05
Don must be happy indeed  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Don must be happy indeed  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Don must be happy indeed  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Don must be happy indeed  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
OASIS Has Different Specs For Rights Management  Edward Meyers | 11/28/05
file formats can't manage copyright  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
file formats can't manage copyright  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
And a red herring...  John Le'Brecage | 11/28/05
How does MSO XML handle rights management?  Physco Dude | 11/29/05
Formats don't handle rights, programs do.  mosborne | 11/29/05
What I find interesting is ...  George Jay | 11/28/05
Huh? What is unproven?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
Unproven  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
YBK, Office has had XML for years.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
Office 2003 Is Not Office 12/OPEN XML  Edward Meyers | 11/28/05
And the beat goes on...  Physco Dude | 11/28/05
Penalties for non-compliance needed  Sxooter_z | 11/28/05
Only if it works both ways...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
Orwell  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Maybe you should read what I wrote again.  Sxooter_z | 11/29/05
Validation  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
GReat idea, Especially the reversion to Public Domain. -NT  Update victim | 11/29/05
Alas, it only works the other way.  blu_z | 12/01/05
I.E, Microsoft Came In And Threatened Mass.  itanalyst | 11/28/05
So, do I say "I Told You So" yet??/  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/28/05
Of course you do  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
just as well microsoft didnt resort to dirty tricks  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
Improving customer goodwill  Michael Kelly | 11/28/05
Small world  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
Small world  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/28/05
No, you get to eat crow.  John Le'Brecage | 11/28/05
right when I'm gone totally cold about it:- it's junk  hipparchus2001 | 11/28/05
Schemas # Format  mosborne | 11/28/05
Interesting...  John Le'Brecage | 11/28/05
Sure  mosborne | 11/30/05
Why IP owners should fret  vampares | 11/28/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here