On mySimon: Christian Louboutin Very Prive Pumps
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 2 of 12:
Next »
« Previous
Since When
"that would be required to license their technology in order to legally play back most copyrighted music and videos"

Since processor based equipment became 'process signalling,? What I do with my network,or what is defined of it is my business.The statement is a blatent lie of course - legally,.So my stereos speakers are processor based and programable then DMCA means your assets on my decision of 'liscence or not. I dont think so.No it means my assets on my DMCA and NOT YOUR LISCENCE to MY equipment.

There is zero liability with royalties ,NONE.The asset is within the esthetic hollywood knows this at this reading.It is NOT in the royalties. Processed signaling does not change DMCA to make that statement of legality towards it meaning YOUR LISCENCE of MY ASSET.

The esthetic is the 'use,it is NOT the ROYALTY of broadcast.Processed signaling does this RIGHT.It does NOT mean the DMCA had been created for YOUR LISCENCE to that esthetic of a royalty.

DMCA says NOTHING of 'LISCENCING COPY OF FAIR USE MATERIALS.The scam here is to vacate the esthetic of the processed signaling by vacating the person of its use for technology - trailing that ROYALTY is part of a person dealt via a liscence described in DMCA. It is NOT described.

You are mistaken this person goes without the technology or media because the asset of the esthetic is now a person of 'liscence.

It is WRONG.Flawed to the core. The ROYALTY argument will loose. This same idea even though patend pend - will leave suspect that 'any processed signaling of 'copyrighted music vacates the person of the use of the technology on the wishes of the copyright holder.

Your RIGHT.But your also incorrect. Perhaps communications from broadcast needs a buff up.

Mainly because I dont want to talk about it.


-just talking.
Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 01/30/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Ten pin.  ParadigmOdyssey | 01/30/04
Since When  ParadigmOdyssey | 01/30/04
Open Standard DRM is an oxymoron  solprovider | 01/30/04
Analog Technology IS Real Technology  ParadigmOdyssey | 01/31/04
not many peopl egonna buy  JWatson77 | 01/30/04
what happens in a 20 years when  JWatson77 | 01/30/04
Tech giants look down @ fat guts and small  cybershoplifter | 01/31/04
Ahh, the sound of no one buying that crap  Xunil_Sierutuf | 01/31/04
New opertunities  nite_w0lf | 01/31/04
Want to know how to defeat ANY DRM?  toomuchgreeatea@... | 01/31/04
Re: Want to know how to defeat ANY DRM?  Franklin_z | 02/01/04
(NT) Keyword is ANY - and that includes the FUTURE  toomuchgreeatea@... | 02/01/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here